With all the talk of the different states refusing to allow the refugees in, what is your stance?
English
#Offtopic
-
8 RepliesWe can't trust anyone anymore
-
Not until we have the whole ISIS situation handled.
-
States can't deny them Lel. Those governors who say they won't let them in look like idiots
-
Just toughen the system that allows them in. Done
-
I think it's too early to say
-
7 RepliesEdited by Raul: 11/18/2015 7:21:23 AMWhy should America let people in who hate this country anyway
-
4 RepliesThey'll mess up the gene poll
-
14 RepliesEdited by Seven: 11/18/2015 1:28:02 AMYou want what happened in Paris? Say yes. If you have the not as morally good but likely smarter option/opinion, don't let them in, say no.
-
All of you voting no understand that if ISIS wants to attack the US they can likely easily manage it whether or not we accept refuges or not...
-
1 ReplyGive them background checks and citizenship. Welcome to the most racist country in North America.
-
4 RepliesHow the -blam!- are they going to travel ALL the way to America on a wooden boat?
-
48 RepliesEdited by IIIEPINEPHRINE: 11/18/2015 7:41:40 PMNo. While I am a big advocate of helping others, I place my own well-being and safety and that of my fellow Americans above foreigners.
-
No. I have enough people to hate as it is.
-
8 RepliesBut the real question is, would Syria take in American refugees? I don't think so, imo.
-
Edited by NeXuS: 11/19/2015 12:32:52 AMUntil you guys (and the rest of the western powers) stop arming rebels to fight Assad, unintentionally (or perhaps intentionally) arming ISIS, or stop bombing Syria completely, then [b]YES[/b]. [i]It's a moral obligation[/i]. The West (spearheaded by the USA), Russia, the Rebels, ISIS, and Assad, are [b]ALL[/b] to blame, but you guys across the pond just stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes, and hum "[i][b]It's nothing to do with us[/b][/i]", or you spout the usual ignorant rhetoric; "[b][i]We've got enough problems as it is[/i][/b]". Newsflash arseholes, this [b]IS[/b] your problem, and you're as much to blame as the rest. Some would say you guys are [b]more[/b] culpable. The good old US of A (and some European countries) destabilised the entire region, and now the refugees are flooding Europe. [b]Take some -blam!-ing responsibility[/b]. Capitalism, democracy, freedom; coming to a city near you, whether you like it or not. Im starting to feel like [url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registration_acts_(comics)]this[/url] might become an actual practice.
-
9 RepliesUS should take care of their 30,000 homeless vets before giving 10,000 refugees a free home food and healthcare. I do feel bad for them but there are plenty of other countries they can go
-
2 RepliesNo. You can only be so "politically correct" until the bomb goes off.
-
I voted yes.
-
For all of you saying no you're letting ISIS win by planting the fear that an Immigrant is gonna blow up in a Walmart. We should always be inclined to help people. However we shouldn't let anyone in until after intensive screenings.
-
2 RepliesTbh we have enough problems inside the US as is, not that i dont want to help them or anything, but i think we need to figure ourselves out before we let even more people come in
-
16 RepliesWe don't need more bullshit in this country, [b]the gates have been opened far too wide for far too long.[/b]
-
of course, how can we be so cruel to turn our backs to people in need?
-
4 RepliesA short cartoon about the refugee crisis. You kids like cartoons right?
-
1 ReplyI think we need to solve our problems before solving other people's problems
-
169 RepliesAnyone voting "no" has forgotten what is printed on the Statue of Liberty: [quote]Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me: I lift my lamp beside the golden door.[/quote]
-
10 RepliesRather them come here than Europe