{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/20/2015 10:05:21 PM
2
Did you miss the bit where as an example he states that Gjallarhorn is effectively dead because it is a year 1 exotic and will remain at year one values.
Yet you spent most of the day telling me this wasn't the case
English
-
I told you over and over again that year one weapons were not going to be able to have infusion, they weren't being brought up. That's exactly what I told you. So yeah ghorn not ascending to year two stats proves that, and the facts that zero legendaries from year one are acts ending proves exactly my point. Please please please quote where in our conversation I said anything that would amount to year one weapons coming into year two?
-
Lol you are an idiot.
-
So you are proven wrong yet I am the idiot? Ok well I have proven my point time say goodnight sweet prince and you to my mute list. Did I mention you were wrong?
-
Haha everyone please show this guy that not a single thing I have said has been about year one weapons coming forward, I've been saying the opposite. What a laugh he has provided today!!!
