{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/18/2016 5:02:14 PM
39
Which has better multiplayer, Destiny or Battlefield 4?
What do you think has a better multiplayer? This has crossed my mind while playing Destiny and Battlegield recently. I say that Battlefield 4 has a better multiplayer because of the gun customization and the vehicle and infantry warfare diversity.
English
#Gaming
-
Depends on what MP you are talking about. Destiny has MP for Raids, Strikes, and levels where as Battlefield has it only for PVP. If we are looking at Crucible vs BattlefieldMP then I'm not sure. In the Crucible, I get to compete with guns that I worked hard fighting aliens or grinding RNG for. In Battlefield it is more about how you use the tools given rather than the tools themselves. That's my outlook on it, but I have fun in both.
-
8 RepliesI can't stand Battlefield for only one reason: It pisses me off that my character can't hold a damn gun straight. Take one step, he throws it halfway across the screen. It's ridiculously annoying.
-
I like both.. :)
-
Battlefield 4 by a longshot
-
Battlefield 4, even when it was broken at launch is still better than the crucible.
-
Battlefield 4
-
Anyone who doesn't say BF4 probably aren't old enough for it anyways
-
Put a pro destiny sniper in bf4 . Wtf why are my shots not hitting Why are they going down so much Gravity hates you
-
1 ReplyWhat tastes better? Sun dried dog turd or 7 layer chocolate cake?
-
My intro to BF. Hardline. Im invalidated here, cuz my experience with both was horrible. One due to stupid devs. The other? Well....I couldn't make it passed the goddamned tutorial because of ALL THE FING GLITCHES!
-
1 ReplyToo completely different play styles.
-
Bf4 . That was really easy
-
I think they are completely different kinds of games
-
2 RepliesDestiny when I want small scale arena combat Battlefield when I want large scale open combat
-
4 RepliesEdited by Beefjerky007: 5/19/2016 2:18:39 AMI'd rather rub 20 grit sandpaper against my balls than play Destiny's PVP again.... so I guess BF4 wins.
-
7 RepliesOn one side we have a badly done second thought made by developers who think making everything OP is balanced. On the other we have a glitchy piece of shit that lags out the ass and can't stop itself from doing something wrong. I choose suicide
-
2 RepliesDestiny, without SBMM
-
Destiny doesn't even stand a chance. BF4 by leagues.
-
All pvp sucks
-
10 RepliesCompletely different games. If BF was 6v6 it would suck, if Destiny was 64v64 it would be amazing.
-
1 ReplyComparing a 32v32 multiplayer (or is it 64v64? Can't remember) to a 6v6 and a 3v3 game. Lemme know how that works out for you.
-
Edited by DanGanMan: 5/19/2016 5:40:19 PMBattlefield for sure ~[i]Arrogant Prick[/i]
-
So you're trying to compare Battlefield to some lag fest where everyone and their mom seem to be from the boonies with Mcdonald's wifi.
-
2 RepliesBattlefield, no contest tbh Destiny's Multiplayer actively encourages Lag switching and punishes other people randomly for no reason
-
Well, battlefield 4 doesn't have a lag fest, shitstorm, for a mp. So I guess it's better.
-
Halo REACH
