{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MC 077 Lasombra:
3/15/2024 1:49:45 AM
1
Does anyone think Darkness isn’t paracausal?
I’ve seen some spinfoil but this takes the cake.
I’ve never seen someone try to claim Darkness isn’t paracausal.
Anyone else share this idea?
Am I the odd duck for thinking it is? I mean it’s been called that since D1, right?
I think the person who made up the idea that Savathun is Mara’s mother might have to hand over the crown of Spinfoil Master.
That esteemed title now belongs to another.
-
4 RepliesEdited by Shockwave 989: 3/15/2024 2:29:32 AMMisrepresentation at its finest. [quote]By Unveiling, the Gardener became the Light, not paracausality. The Winnower became the Darkness, not paracausality. Paracausality is a consequence, not the direct result.[/quote] You claimed the Gardener made the law of paracausality, which is what the character of the Winnower objects to in the story. I challenged that and explained that the proposed law wasn’t paracausality, but the Light, a power that awards those who allow for complexity. Which is what the Winnower challenges. Forms of paracausality like the Ahamkara arise because of this sudden bending of the rules. [spoiler]Which doesn’t even matter because Unveiling isn’t literal and it’s not an accurate origin of the universe[/spoiler]
