{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/9/2019 8:44:01 PM
4
How should they do it? Seems like they try to balance the teams so they are even. Should they take 12 people, group the top 6 skilled players and put them on one team and put the 6 on the other team so they always lose?
English
-
Edited by iNetRunner: 9/9/2019 9:16:21 PMLike it is currently? You aren’t seriously asking that, but the obvious non-sarcastic response is: 3 of the best in alpha, and 3 others in bravo. (Edit: Obviously split in round-robin fashion. So, that best and second best are on opposing teams.) Same solit with the less skilled players. But never put only one skilled player on a side (with five potatoes), that isn’t fun for the team either.
-
I think its fairly balanced. I dont think there is anything wrong with a 50% win percentage. I'm at 51% and i mostly solo.
-
I’m at 1363 matches 48% W/L. I’m mostly solo too. You do realize that that is artificial/manufactured result? No way is the standard deviation just 1%.
-
Edited by Sweet Lew 88: 9/9/2019 9:27:59 PMI'm sure i could skew that number if i wanted to focus on losing. People still need to focus on winning to get wins. I'm close to 3000 games played.
