-
5 RepliesBoth do and would suck. Bungo is a greedy shit company and 343 doesn't know what they're doing
-
1 ReplyWow the fanboyism is really shining. I enjoyed what 343 did with Halo 4. I thought the new enemies were well done and had a good time playing it. Haven't played 5 yet. I have enjoyed things with Destiny, too. The raids are the most fun things I have ever done. And both companies have made some mistakes and poor choices. I don't get why people shit all over 343 so much. Did you really want to fight the same old enemies for 15 years? I do think Destiny would have turned out much more polished and a complete product had somebody other than Activision been involved (but anything I blame them for I also blame Bungie - they chose to partner with them.). Even though we don't have proof, in my mind, all the core people that left did so because of Activision and greed. Take that away, and we would still have those people and possibly the original story and plans for the game.
-
3 Replies5's actually pretty good..
-
Why Are you all you fellas being so negative bungie was amazing when they made Halo one Halo two and Halo three but just because the mechanics change just a little bit when 343 industries took over the Halo series doesn't mean that that made it a bad game or that it sucks yeah it's different yeah it's a change, but the only thing that's consistent life, change? I think the number one reason destiny was so successful is because of bungee because of the halo followers Ike myself. I'm not saying I'm A pro Fessional player by any means but I will say that I have loved halo since the very beginning and I was waiting for Jesse to come out when I found the Easter egg in halo ODST. I just truly believe that just because the mechanics of the game change doesn't make that game a bad game it opens the door to a much broader audience for Fanbase. But honestly in my opinion who three was the best halo ever made campaign was amazing multiplayer of course was the highlight and now halo five guardians is also great I feel like they brought back the mean mechanics of halo 1 2 and 3 as well as added new abilities that shows the Halo franchise is still evolving with the times. Anyways I'm sorry if I made any grammatical errors I just got off work and I'm driving home right now and I'm trying to get Siri on my phone to write what I'm trying to say and to be in a percent honest I must have a serious list or a speech impediment because half the shit I say doesn't make it on paper. Jthanks y'all have a good evening
-
1 ReplyWell seeing as 343 was created by Microsoft inside their halo sciences division, it would mean PlayStation wouldn't have destiny or halo.
-
Destiny would suck, Halo would at least feel good again.
-
Pretty sure a 5 year old could have done better with destiny.
-
4 RepliesAs long as there's Nathan Fillion.
-
4 Replies343 was created specifically to take over the Halo franchise. Their nam is derived from 343 Guilty Spark.
-
6 Replies7x7x7 = 343
-