Yes our heroes the republican party must stop the predatory trans people from entering the wrong bathroom. Republicans always saving the day.
/Sarcasm
What are your thoughts?
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/04/north-carolina%E2%80%99s-terrible-anti-lgbt-law-even-worse-we-thought
http://abcnews.go.com/US/north-carolinas-controversial-anti-lgbt-bill-explained/story?id=37898153
Feel free to look up other sources.
-
1 ReplyEh I don't give a flying -blam!-
-
Edited by tc_bendy: 4/14/2016 9:55:28 PMPeople go into the bathroom that corresponds with what they look like and if they have a dick or vagina. I don't think LGBT people should be fighting for something stupid. I don't give a -blam!- if you are a guy who says they are really a girl. You are not going into the girls bathroom just because you say you are really a girl. Same goes for women. If they say they are a boy even though they are a women they should not be allowed in the boys bathroom.
-
8 RepliesHow is a law that says people need to use the restrooms their parts match with "anti lgtb"? I'm really curious. Also good job NC for not bending over for these professional victims of the regressive left
-
1 ReplyWhat about safety of individuals using the bathroom or locker room? What is to stop a sexual assualt or pedophile from claiming they are allowed to use it because they identify as that gemder, but instead they using the law to prey on a innocent person.
-
11 RepliesI don't want some confused creep in the same bathroom as my sister or mother. It's a safety thing. Biology wasn't created with Warm PC fuzzies. The fact that I could walk in a Women's bathroom and do the Harlem Shake with my pants down really worries me.
-
So Caitlin Jenner would have to use the men's room. I feel like more men would be uncomfortable with this then women.
-
1 ReplyI live in south Carolina and i am a bit happy about it just because, for once, we arnt the worst Carolina =p
-
No need to dispute it. Porn sites already punished them enough
-
Who gives a shit what bathroom you use? I would be absolutely fine using either restroom. It makes no difference to me, and it shouldn't matter [i]so fúcking much[/i] to all the transgender people out there.
-
This country is filled with mentally ill people
-
So it would look like this
-
3 RepliesEdited by GreenW: 4/14/2016 5:49:20 PMTake it to the supreme court. It's unconstitutional. Edit: Who gives a -blam!- about the bathrooms? The big problem is in the article; it bars people from having legal recourse in state courts if they're fired based on race/gender
-
5 RepliesPeople expected this to not pass? It's the Bible Belt guys. Everyone's conservative as hell.
-
1 ReplyIt also gives employers the right to discriminate against ANYTHING they wish, and bans local governments from protecting employees. The LBGT part was literally a cover to sneak that in there, so when it is repealed, then they can leave that part in there. As someone who works in North Carolina, I am extremely worried for my job security. The fact that my views on certain issues can affect my position and wage more than my work ethic bothers me a lot.
-
Inb4anomaly
-
Yet Republican politicians are accused of sex offense more often than transgenders using the "wrong" bathroom.
-
2 RepliesEdited by superassassin364: 4/14/2016 11:43:06 AMAs someone living in North Carolina, I think both sides are wrong. People shouldn't just pick and choose what bathroom they want to go in. As for conservatives, making all transgenders use the restroom of the gender they were born with would have to include the ones actually passable for the opposite gender. People would still be uncomfortable with someone who is seemingly the opposite gender going into their bathroom. Feel free to let me know if I'm wrong about anything though
-
5 RepliesI don't think it's up to the government to decide who can use what restroom.
-
2 RepliesSo are we going it yoink down the pants of every person that has to take a piss? Are we going to place cameras in the stalls? This is law is ridiculous. No one made a fuss of it before this.
-
3 RepliesSorry but don't American Republicans think the Democratic Party is taking away American freedom?
-
3 RepliesThis is the stupidest -blam!-ing outrage I have ever seen. If someone looks like a woman and uses the women's restroom no one is going to give a shit. No one is checking birth certificates at the door. If a dude that looks like a dude but identifies as a woman uses the women's restroom then my wife is going to feel extremely uncomfortable. And for what? So a tiny little percentage of a percent of the population can feel comfortable about pooping with people they identify as? It's ridiculous and you know it. I swear people are just sitting around thinking of ways to be more "progressive" which in itself is pretty ironic considering everyone used to just shit in the same bush with each other and now we're going back to that. Also, [quote]Transgender people can use the bathrooms and changing facilities that correspond to their gender identity only if they get the biological sex on their birth certificate changed.[/quote] Well, you went through all the trouble of having your dick lopped off or having one surgically attached, is it somehow too complicated to change your -blam!-ing birth certificate?is that somehow more demeaning than asking a doctor to mutilate your genitals? People need to quit being so ridiculous and just use common sense.
-
My thoughts are people will abuse being able to say they're tran so they can sneak into the opposite gender's room... If you look like a guy go to the -blam!-ing guys room, you can easily use a stall even if you have a lady part k?
-
I think its pretty gay [spoiler](g)AYYYYYYYY LMAO[/spoiler]
-
Amazing
-
5 RepliesThe millionth time I'll say this: Just another reason to not use public toilets...
-