{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/28/2015 5:56:55 PM
1
not when those precision shots are for far less damage.
think DPS. not total damage.
if you do 100 damage every one second, are you doing more damage than if you do 200 damage every 2 seconds?
no. think about the math.
they will add up to roughly the same damage. sure, a 331 attack weapon will have slightly higher DPS than a 300 attack weapon, but it's about that damage burst. when you can one shot a target that a scout rifle has to 3-4 shot, that's the preference.
English
-
That's not even accurate, given the numbers proposed aren't even close, but I understand what you're conveying. At least you're posting a good debate, everyone else is just spewing 'Fatebring is better just because!', so thank you for that.
-
yeah think of it situationally. if you have to pop 3 headshots for the firefly perk to activate, whats the point? i'd rather 1 shot clear 10 thrall. sometimes, that split second 1 shot is all you get. sometimes you don't have time to aim and land several headshots when thrall are running at you at full speed, clogging up your screen
