Microsoft just need to put more deditated wam in TEH CLOUDZ then everyone can has [u]40fps[/u] at 900p! :DDD Next generation r here. Praise MS!

10% of 30 FPS means 3 more FPS. lol

Maybe they should have -blam!-ing realised they were releasing a piece of shit ages ago and actually planned around that, rather than waiting for the whole world to turn around and tell them their games look like ass. The marketing department at Microsoft is an utter farce. How on earth OP sees this as a positive is beyond me. HURRDURR LETS PATCH OUT SHIT AND LETS DOWNLOAD MORE RAM WHILE WE'RE AT IT Beyond retarded.

Nice! I just wish they would change the party system, or add one

[quote][quote] Microsoft may be looking to improve the Xbox One’s graphics performance, a new report from Hothardware.com suggests. Currently, 10% of the machine’s GPU is reserved for the motion-sensing Kinect, but a new patch could loosen that restriction. Sources say Microsoft could allow developers to make use of 8% of that, with the final 2% reserved for voice commands. Xbox One’s performance has been coming under scrutiny since launch, most recently with the news that Tomb Raider: Definitive edition runs at a higher framerate on PS4. Here’s the statement from a Microsoft spokesperson, provided to Forbes: “At Xbox, we are always thinking of what’s next for our platform and looking for new ways to innovate. We believe Kinect is an integral part of the Xbox One platform and its use of voice and gesture lead to unrivaled ease of use, premium experiences and interactivity for consumers. Beyond that, we have no further comment” Noncommittal, naturally, but notice what it doesn’t say. Normally I’d expect to hear “Microsoft does not comment on rumors or speculation,” the boilerplate answer for the vast majority of reports. It leads me to believe there might be some truth in it. It would certainly make sense — games that aren’t making heavy use of the Kinect, for example, the aforementioned Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition, could easily make good use of extra processing power. All of this number competition has added up to some bad press for Xbox One with core gamers, so a little more juice could assuage frame rate issues. The Kinect is arguably the crucial element of the Xbox One — it’s the reason that it costs $100 more, its voice and gesture controls are one of the most important features of the platform’s entertainment lineup, and it’s the biggest differentiating feature from the PS4. Even so, few launch titles have taken any real advantage of it. The one Kinect-centric game, Fighter Within, sits at an impressive 24 on Metacritic — that’s one mixed review and 37 negative reviews. I’ve tried to use Xbox Fitness, which works fine as a normal exercise video, but is hopeless when it comes to recognizing anything I’m doing. The voice commands lose a little luster once you find yourself repeating “Xbox, Pause” for the fifth time. All of that is going to take a lot of work to fix. This change would say something a little different — it reminds us that the Xbox One is not just a Kinect machine. It’s a traditional console as well, and traditional games should be able to use it as such.[/quote] If this is true, it'll be another reason to shut up the Sony drones.[/quote]Yeah this was expected Microsoft says it's UI and performance will often be patched and fixed. While the PS4 will pretty much remain the same.

Would this make the kinect worse

Also If the devs can learn how to use the static ram. It could really seperate itself from PS.

If you understood anything about what is inside of the Xbox One, you'd understand that there is no excuse for it to not be running Tomb Raider at 60FPS in 1080p. It seems like a lot of third party developers aren't putting in the time, because every jaw-dropping beautiful game I've seen on Xbox One is first party.

The PS4 still has a 50% raw power advantage over the xb1. Nothing can change that, it's going to be a long generation for MS

Just wait until they activate the Cloud.... Once the Cloud technology is activated, it's estimated that games should be able to run at 7K resolutions at 682 FPS. MS knows what they're doing. 6v6 and bots was just the beginning. Prepare your anuses.

Great, anything that can increase performance is always good in my books. However, hardware > software.

Why would they shut up when the PS4 would still be more powerful and the fact people [u]never[/u] shut up on the internet anyway?

This still won't bring parity between the GPU of the PS4 and Xbone.