I found this article on the [url=http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/2013/08/23/ps4-games-should-do-either-single-player-or-multiplayer-but-not-both-resources-should-be-funneled-not-diluted/]Official PlayStation Magazine UK website[/url], and I personally found it pretty interesting. The focus of the article is PlayStation, but I think the message can be translated to Xbox, and games in general. [quote]The point I’m getting at is that few games manage to provide both single and multiplayer offerings that are actually worthwhile. [/quote] [quote]more games are coming with unnecessary, bolted-on MP options, or a story mode that plays second fiddle.[/quote] [quote]Certain genres (eg sports) or series (Borderlands, for one) are, by their nature, able to offer both without compromise, but these are exceptions. Where resources must diverge, developers should make a choice. That way we get unforgettable experiences on both sides of the fence. And the only price to pay? No more Nathan Drake multiplayer. Heaven forbid.[/quote] Discuss