I know this, but at first glance, seeing all that in front of you will make anybody think. I mean, you see what looks like a doppleganger little girl, a bunch of fundraisers starting before the shooting happened, a class by FEMA or something on how to deal with crisises involving children going on at the same place at the SAME TIME as the shooting, actors being interviewed, few videos of the children/teachers, very few ambulances on scene and all roads blocked to and from the school so none could arrive, a mysterious second gunman never spoken of again, the shooter's weapon being identified as the assault rifle by the medical examiner, even though it was supposedly in his trunk the whole time according to police... Who would see all of that and think all is fine there? There wasn't an obvious explaination to all of that immediately; it took time so I can easily understand why people suspected foul play. I think you'd have to be foolish to NOT be understanding of that.

Teh puma is going to restate this again. >To question is fine. >However to come up with an entire conspiracy theory on this without getting crucial information is not. He understands the point you're trying to make(hopefully), however he just doesn't see room for a rational mind to immediately claim conspiracy theory like many people did.

Well, I disagree. I can easily see why people would jump to that given the evidence. I don't think there are grounds left to continue with that claim, but I certainly disagree that the claim was never valid.