I find it funny how people think Obama's campaign against terrorism is affective when we have British, French, American, and Japanese hostages in Algeria.
Your opinion on how Obama can't seem to solve this issue?
English
-
3 RespuestasAlso I'm really hungry right now and there's no food in the house. Thanks Obama!
-
6 RespuestasEditado por Quantum: 1/19/2013 3:47:10 AMMy opinion? He's done far more than Bush, using less money, and at the cost of less American lives. He also hasn't destroyed the reputation of the United States, hence why the majority of the countries in the world preferred Obama to lead America from 2013-2016, as opposed to Romney. (BBC Poll) Obama's campaign against terrorism has been effective.[b] But, he's not god.[/b] He cannot eliminate everyone, nor be at every place at once. This is just as dumb as the GOP blaming Obama for not cooperating while they are too busy filibustering everything, even some of their own plans *cough* Mitch McConnell *Cough*.
-
*effective And from what I understand [url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/01/17/is-the-algeria-hostage-crisis-really-al-qaeda/]the people responsible for what you're referencing aren't in fact Al Qaeda.[/url] The reality is that the terrorism "threat" that we were all convinced was a pressing issue during the neocon-led Bush administration isn't in fact that big of a threat at all. And even if we assume that the Bush fantasies are facts, no single individual is going to "disband" Al Qaeda anymore than a towel absorbs every drop of water. It's just not possible, because there will always be wackos in the world and eliminating them is like trying to make sure every single hair on your head is the same length.
-
Do you think it's easy to take down an underground terrorist organization?
-
[url=http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/267/8/c/obama_riding_a_lion_by_sharpwriter-d5ftze6.jpg]Argument invalid.[/url]
-
2 Respuestasyou're fat
-
4 RespuestasEffective. Not affective.
-
Editado por Makeshyft: 1/19/2013 3:42:59 AMFirst, it's "effective". Second, I wasn't aware Obama could click the 'disband' button on terrorism and it'd all be cool. Third, if there is a 'disband' button George W. is all the more an idiot for not palmhammering it in the first place.
-
Fighting insurgent groups seems pretty hard.