{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/18/2011 8:20:39 AM
485
Anon occupying Wall Street for 2 months-HAPPENING NOW!
Happening right now, as we type.
[url=http://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/occupywallstreet]So, do you support these heroes? Or do you not?[/url]
Anyone who doesn't support these protests should be shot.
[url=http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/wall-street-protest-begins-with-demonstrators-blocked/]The Revolution has begun.[/url]
[Edited on 09.18.2011 12:22 AM PDT]
-
"Don't ask what your country can do for you. Ask instead what you can do for your country." [Edited on 09.18.2011 12:39 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] coolmike699 Occam's Razor is a logical fallacy. It's probably not a good idea to use it to support your argument.[/quote] You know what, I'm not even going to bother arguing against you complete f**ktarded morons. Forget OR if you want, obviously you're a conspiracy nut and hate those logical analysis tools that rip your theories to shreds, there are no magical cures being held back and you're a damn retard if you think there are.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] deltahalo UK Note: Clinical trials can last up to a decade before a drug is introduced into circulation.[/quote] Note: Only when the drug has serious side effects that need to be eliminated.
-
[quote]Hydrogen powered cars aren't some magical cure to oil. There's one fact you must first recognize. Oil is the cheapest, most portable, and safe source of energy ever found. It's truly an amazing energy source. It's not like you can say "Hey, there's a lot of hydrogen in the universe, let's just drop oil and use hydrogen." No, hydrogen is expensive to isolate, highly explosive, there's no infrastructure to support it for mainstream use, it provides nowhere near the same amount of energy as does oil, and it can't replace oil with our current technology at least. No freedom in America? I ask you, what [i]can't[/i] you do?[/quote] Not so much that, its just that using nuclear energy to supply electric cars is a far better Idea.[/quote]You're talking about two different things, unless you're suggesting micro reactors in each car. If you haven't noticed, there's the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, buses and trucks are starting to go all electric, Ford Ranger EV, Toyota RAV4 EV, and more and more are just pouring out of automakers. Now, those just plug in to your wall for power. Powering the grid with nuclear power is a separate issue, and there's many reasons why you would or wouldn't want that. For one, disposal of the waste is a big challenge, as well as maintaining reactors that are now up to 40 years old. Chernobyl was a very unique case of failure, but it was one of the most expensive disasters in history. The point isn't that it's going to happen again and again, it's that nuclear power plants must be very well maintained, managed, and run. You can't just start putting them anywhere and everywhere and hiring the local farmers to run them. But it's also very, very energy dense, it's very clean, and thorium could possibly make it [i]the[/i] energy source of the future.[/quote] No god no, it would be cool though to he have micro reactors in cars. I was suggesting using electric cars powered by electricity made from nuclear energy. It would be cheaper and more efficient than hydrogen. [/quote] People are too stupid to handle nuclear powered cars. We would have 45,000+ instances of nuclear poisoning a year. Once all cars drive themselves error free it would be a viable option.[/quote]I'm pretty sure he meant that cars should be all-electric and that the grid they recharge from is powered by nuclear reactors (as opposed to oil/coal plants like most power sources used today).[/quote] That's exactly what I'm saying. [Edited on 09.18.2011 12:37 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero It's not a conspiracy theory. Where the -blam!- did you get that from? [/quote]Are you autistic or something? "Hurr durr they cured cancer but the drug companies run America and want to profit off people's deaths" is the very definition of a conspiracy theory.[/quote]So what's your version, then?[/quote]My version of what?[/quote] [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote]LOL, that's not a cure for cancer. Did you actually read the article? It's not a cure, and it only works for lung cancer, in conjunction with existing treatments. It helps people live a bit longer, but it sure as hell isn't a cure.[/quote] [url=http://www.impactlab.net/2007/01/31/cure-for-cancer-found-but-no-one-is-talking/]Is this the cure, then?[/url] [/quote]Oh look, it's about DCA, which another user has already disproven:[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] SandtrapRemake Perhaps you need to [url=http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/cancercure.asp]research this topic[/url] a bit more?[/quote]So no, that's not a cure for cancer, either.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero It's not a conspiracy theory. Where the -blam!- did you get that from? [/quote]Are you autistic or something? "Hurr durr they cured cancer but the drug companies run America and want to profit off people's deaths" is the very definition of a conspiracy theory.[/quote]So what's your version, then?[/quote]My version of what?[/quote] [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote]LOL, that's not a cure for cancer. Did you actually read the article? It's not a cure, and it only works for lung cancer, in conjunction with existing treatments. It helps people live a bit longer, but it sure as hell isn't a cure.[/quote] [url=http://www.impactlab.net/2007/01/31/cure-for-cancer-found-but-no-one-is-talking/]Is this the cure, then?[/url] [/quote]Let's see a link to the peer reviewed medical report, not a blog reposting a story.[/quote] How can I? There is little to no media coverage.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero It's not a conspiracy theory. Where the -blam!- did you get that from? [/quote]Are you autistic or something? "Hurr durr they cured cancer but the drug companies run America and want to profit off people's deaths" is the very definition of a conspiracy theory.[/quote]So what's your version, then?[/quote]My version of what?[/quote] [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote]LOL, that's not a cure for cancer. Did you actually read the article? It's not a cure, and it only works for lung cancer, in conjunction with existing treatments. It helps people live a bit longer, but it sure as hell isn't a cure.[/quote] [url=http://www.impactlab.net/2007/01/31/cure-for-cancer-found-but-no-one-is-talking/]Is this the cure, then?[/url] [/quote] [url=http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/05/dichloroacetate_dca_and_cancer_deja_vu_a.php]Lolno.[/url]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ness4side [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What is thiss [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ness4side [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What is thiss Or you know, actually research candidates and vote, seriously why are so many people dumb?[/quote] The problem with that is the media has a big influence over people's decisions on who to vote for. Also, I'M GOING TO KICK YOUR ASS IN GEARS 3 ON TUESDAY![/quote] Gears 3? Also we have the internet, people need to, lrn2research[/quote] Ya I told you I was going to remind you. Even if we have internet, the majority of the population will still get most of their information from the popular media stations or broadcasters of information.[/quote] Pretty sure you're trolling me because I'm not even getting gears 3. People need to stop relying solely on news media,most of the time it has a bias towards one side.
-
Note: Clinical trials can last up to a decade before a drug is introduced into circulation.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero It's not a conspiracy theory. Where the -blam!- did you get that from? [/quote]Are you autistic or something? "Hurr durr they cured cancer but the drug companies run America and want to profit off people's deaths" is the very definition of a conspiracy theory.[/quote]So what's your version, then?[/quote]My version of what?[/quote] [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote]LOL, that's not a cure for cancer. Did you actually read the article? It's not a cure, and it only works for lung cancer, in conjunction with existing treatments. It helps people live a bit longer, but it sure as hell isn't a cure.[/quote] [url=http://www.impactlab.net/2007/01/31/cure-for-cancer-found-but-no-one-is-talking/]Is this the cure, then?[/url] [/quote]Let's see a link to the peer reviewed medical report, not a blog reposting a story.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero It's not a conspiracy theory. Where the -blam!- did you get that from? [/quote]Are you autistic or something? "Hurr durr they cured cancer but the drug companies run America and want to profit off people's deaths" is the very definition of a conspiracy theory.[/quote]So what's your version, then?[/quote]My version of what?[/quote] [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote]LOL, that's not a cure for cancer. Did you actually read the article? It's not a cure, and it only works for lung cancer, in conjunction with existing treatments. It helps people live a bit longer, but it sure as hell isn't a cure.[/quote] [url=http://www.impactlab.net/2007/01/31/cure-for-cancer-found-but-no-one-is-talking/]Is this the cure, then?[/url]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] slayer2142 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf Hydrogen powered cars aren't some magical cure to oil. There's one fact you must first recognize. Oil is the cheapest, most portable, and safe source of energy ever found. It's truly an amazing energy source. It's not like you can say "Hey, there's a lot of hydrogen in the universe, let's just drop oil and use hydrogen." No, hydrogen is expensive to isolate, highly explosive, there's no infrastructure to support it for mainstream use, it provides nowhere near the same amount of energy as does oil, and it can't replace oil with our current technology at least. No freedom in America? I ask you, what [i]can't[/i] you do?[/quote] Not so much that, its just that using nuclear energy to supply electric cars is a far better Idea.[/quote]You're talking about two different things, unless you're suggesting micro reactors in each car. If you haven't noticed, there's the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, buses and trucks are starting to go all electric, Ford Ranger EV, Toyota RAV4 EV, and more and more are just pouring out of automakers. Now, those just plug in to your wall for power. Powering the grid with nuclear power is a separate issue, and there's many reasons why you would or wouldn't want that. For one, disposal of the waste is a big challenge, as well as maintaining reactors that are now up to 40 years old. Chernobyl was a very unique case of failure, but it was one of the most expensive disasters in history. The point isn't that it's going to happen again and again, it's that nuclear power plants must be very well maintained, managed, and run. You can't just start putting them anywhere and everywhere and hiring the local farmers to run them. But it's also very, very energy dense, it's very clean, and thorium could possibly make it [i]the[/i] energy source of the future.[/quote] No god no, it would be cool though to he have micro reactors in cars. I was suggesting using electric cars powered by electricity made from nuclear energy. It would be cheaper and more efficient than hydrogen. [/quote] People are too stupid to handle nuclear powered cars. We would have 45,000+ instances of nuclear poisoning a year. Once all cars drive themselves error free it would be a viable option.[/quote]I'm pretty sure he meant that cars should be all-electric and that the grid they recharge from is powered by nuclear reactors (as opposed to oil/coal plants like most power sources used today).
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] slayer2142 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ Not so much that, its just that using nuclear energy to supply electric cars is a far better Idea.[/quote]You're talking about two different things, unless you're suggesting micro reactors in each car. If you haven't noticed, there's the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, buses and trucks are starting to go all electric, Ford Ranger EV, Toyota RAV4 EV, and more and more are just pouring out of automakers. Now, those just plug in to your wall for power. Powering the grid with nuclear power is a separate issue, and there's many reasons why you would or wouldn't want that. For one, disposal of the waste is a big challenge, as well as maintaining reactors that are now up to 40 years old. Chernobyl was a very unique case of failure, but it was one of the most expensive disasters in history. The point isn't that it's going to happen again and again, it's that nuclear power plants must be very well maintained, managed, and run. You can't just start putting them anywhere and everywhere and hiring the local farmers to run them. But it's also very, very energy dense, it's very clean, and thorium could possibly make it [i]the[/i] energy source of the future.[/quote] No god no, it would be cool though to he have micro reactors in cars. I was suggesting using electric cars powered by electricity made from nuclear energy. It would be cheaper and more efficient than hydrogen. [/quote] People are too stupid to handle nuclear powered cars. We would have 45,000+ instances of nuclear poisoning a year. Once all cars drive themselves error free it would be a viable option.[/quote] Yep, but we won't find out how to make a micro reactor type deal for a looong time.[/quote] We have had nuclear powered submarines for a while. It could happen sooner then we would think.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Real Madrid [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Sage Of Halo Ok, I've gone through half this thread and I still don't know what this protest is protesting. This reminds me of the [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pvnoe1y1UNU&feature=player_detailpage#t=468s]Rally at the Park[/url] from GTA3[/quote][/quote]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] annoyinginge [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero So what's your version, then?[/quote] No viable cure for either cancer or AIDS has been found, which would explain why said cures aren't on the market. Occam's Razor bro.[/quote] Occam's Razor is a logical fallacy. It's probably not a good idea to use it to support your argument.
-
I don't see why people keep hating on capitalism. It's the most ideal form for an economy.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero It's not a conspiracy theory. Where the -blam!- did you get that from? [/quote]Are you autistic or something? "Hurr durr they cured cancer but the drug companies run America and want to profit off people's deaths" is the very definition of a conspiracy theory.[/quote]So what's your version, then?[/quote]My version of what?[/quote] [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote]LOL, that's not a cure for cancer. Did you actually read the article? It's not a cure, and it only works for lung cancer, in conjunction with existing treatments. It helps people live a bit longer, but it sure as hell isn't a cure.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What is thiss [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ulquiorra Cifer What are they protesting about?[/quote] from what I gather,how corrupt the government and america is and corporations etc. You know the usual[/quote]Well ok thank you.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero [url=http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/27/4376358-cuba-develops-breakthrough-cancer-drug]Why isn't it being sold worldwide?[/url] Check the date: June 27th, 2008.[/quote] What? A drug that is only useful in combination with radiotherapy, which extends life by 'up to a year' (read: usually a lot less), and had not finished testing when the article was written? Learn2media, they hype things up from nothing. Not sure if you remember the whole MMR-autism thing, but if you do, you'll know how bad the media are at getting science stories in proportion.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What is thiss [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ness4side [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What is thiss Or you know, actually research candidates and vote, seriously why are so many people dumb?[/quote] The problem with that is the media has a big influence over people's decisions on who to vote for. Also, I'M GOING TO KICK YOUR ASS IN GEARS 3 ON TUESDAY![/quote] Gears 3? Also we have the internet, people need to, lrn2research[/quote] Ya I told you I was going to remind you. Even if we have internet, the majority of the population will still get most of their information from the popular media stations or broadcasters of information.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Garland It has become painfully apparent that the people supporting Anonymous's "protest" are angsty teens with zero idea of what they're talking about. All they do is cite conspiracy theories and babble about revolution.[/quote] I agree that it is very hard to take anything Anonymous does seriously. Although, if I was in NY I would at least go down there to check it out.
-
man it's warm in here,should have said that earlier
-
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] slayer2142 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BRADEN OWNZ [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf Hydrogen powered cars aren't some magical cure to oil. There's one fact you must first recognize. Oil is the cheapest, most portable, and safe source of energy ever found. It's truly an amazing energy source. It's not like you can say "Hey, there's a lot of hydrogen in the universe, let's just drop oil and use hydrogen." No, hydrogen is expensive to isolate, highly explosive, there's no infrastructure to support it for mainstream use, it provides nowhere near the same amount of energy as does oil, and it can't replace oil with our current technology at least. No freedom in America? I ask you, what [i]can't[/i] you do?[/quote] Not so much that, its just that using nuclear energy to supply electric cars is a far better Idea.[/quote]You're talking about two different things, unless you're suggesting micro reactors in each car. If you haven't noticed, there's the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, buses and trucks are starting to go all electric, Ford Ranger EV, Toyota RAV4 EV, and more and more are just pouring out of automakers. Now, those just plug in to your wall for power. Powering the grid with nuclear power is a separate issue, and there's many reasons why you would or wouldn't want that. For one, disposal of the waste is a big challenge, as well as maintaining reactors that are now up to 40 years old. Chernobyl was a very unique case of failure, but it was one of the most expensive disasters in history. The point isn't that it's going to happen again and again, it's that nuclear power plants must be very well maintained, managed, and run. You can't just start putting them anywhere and everywhere and hiring the local farmers to run them. But it's also very, very energy dense, it's very clean, and thorium could possibly make it [i]the[/i] energy source of the future.[/quote] No god no, it would be cool though to he have micro reactors in cars. I was suggesting using electric cars powered by electricity made from nuclear energy. It would be cheaper and more efficient than hydrogen. [/quote] People are too stupid to handle nuclear powered cars. We would have 45,000+ instances of nuclear poisoning a year. Once all cars drive themselves error free it would be a viable option.[/quote] Yep, but we won't find out how to make a micro reactor type deal for a looong time. [Edited on 09.18.2011 12:29 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] annoyinginge [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An monkey hero So what's your version, then?[/quote] No viable cure for either cancer or AIDS has been found, which would explain why said cures aren't on the market. Occam's Razor bro.[/quote] They have been found. Oh, man, they have been found.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MC LOL88 i love hearing people argue that those who want to rebel are lazy angsty teens perhaps YOU havent become the victims of our govt's statist behavior? perhaps YOU havent had your rights infringed upon by the police state? perhaps YOU havent seen your family's businesses get -blam!- -blam!- by govt policies that only support big businesses? one does not get a vaccine for chicken pox, flu, or any other sickness after they have become infected... they get the vaccine BEFORE so they can avoid infection... in the same way, one should not revolt after their govt becomes a statist regime, one revolts in order to prevent that from happening. -blam!- Crony Capitalism! -blam!- Statism! -blam!- Politicians! -blam!- Security! -blam!- Tryanny! -blam!- fake freedom! -blam!- the USA![/quote] You're seriously an idiot. Perhaps YOU didn't do all you could to keep your business thriving. Perhaps YOU broke the law, thus had to be handled by law enforcement. Perhaps YOUR family's business fell victim to side effects of a [u]free market[/u] that the majority of the world does not have. Our government hasn't changed at all and is not going to. Calm down, go outside and play some basketball.
