{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/4/2021 7:10:36 AM
1
yeah but in that imaginary space, right, nose is a nose, leg is a leg, swords is a sword, bow is a bow, they do actually put optics on long range rifles and call them snipers...
English
-
Point taken, as soon as you clip a bonafide deathbringer killing aliens at a military test site I’ll accept your argument that this game should be as realistic as escape from tarkov!
-
again, sniper is a sniper, sky is sky, water is water, right, helmet goes on your head not on your legs, in this imaginary badly designed idea, apparently, a pistol has same range as long range optis rifle. A barrel is a barrel right, bullet is a bullet, longer barrel, greater range and accuracy, right, they do have some basic laws of physics here, gravity, density etc..
-
I’ll give you the legitimate reason but I doubt you will take it at face value, feel free to look into it though. I’ll give you a hint! It’s the same reason Rockstar can’t call the vapid dominator a Mustang GT.
-
no I mean like, in this badly designed imaginary world, you got like 17" barrel on one weapon like autorifle, then you have 5" barrel on a pistol, so if they heave the same range, why the 17" barrel ? why not make it pocket weapon with automatic fire and scope ?
-
Editado por piratepatchy243: 9/5/2021 7:34:26 AMThen by your logic shotguns would absolutely destroy at far greater ranges. In all actuality the weapons should be far superior then current ones, being built from them doesn't change that. Advancements will be made however small, which would include such weapons as an oversized pistol that would be good at midrange. If you want a realistic game of the current time why are you even here?
