Bungie, if you are smart, then put in a battle royale mode to save this dying game.
It’s the only things that has already saved tons of other games when they were struggling to survive.
Don’t have it be a PvP thing though. Make it so In the battle royale mode we fight bots/NPC enemies so that all players can win instead of just a couple of no-life try hards constantly stomping everyone else and being the only people to get rewards.
Think about it.
English
#destiny2
-
Whole bunch of no
-
Huh. Now I know what would kill Destiny for me.
-
-
LMATFO! 🤣🤣🤣
-
Editado por AztechTwoStep: 11/28/2019 11:20:20 PMHow about a 50v50 or something like that, that game type is SEVERELY underrated... [spoiler]we already have a free for all, it’s called rumble[/spoiler]
-
4 RespuestasI'm pretty sure they said a year or so ago that, that would never happen.
-
3 Respuestas[quote]Bungie, if you are smart, then put in a battle royale mode to save this dying game. It’s the only things that has already saved tons of other games when they were struggling to survive. Don’t have it be a PvP thing though. Make it so In the battle royale mode we fight bots/NPC enemies so that all players can win instead of just a couple of no-life try hards constantly stomping everyone else and being the only people to get rewards. Think about it.[/quote] No
-
A BR wouldn’t hurt at this point the game doesn’t really know where to go content wise tbh I would rather have a BR then another vex offensive
-
1 RespuestaBattle Royal? All youd see is hunters with stompees or Titans with OEM
-
1 RespuestaOh gawd no. They can't even get 6v6 to work without lag city...
-
reported.
-
1 RespuestaWe don't need to add BR to everything. You already have a ton of options if you want to play a BR, let's not bring D2 into it.
-
1 RespuestaNah we need a horde mode with 12 players against massive amounts of enemies. Like literal hundreds at a time
-
2 RespuestasIt didn’t save Fallout 76
-
5 RespuestasApart from how terrible the idea sounds, bungie wouldn’t be able to support it. Their servers are p2p, and would not be able to handle 70+ people.
-
4 RespuestasHow would that even work with D2
-
1 RespuestaFor all that's sacred: No!
-
2 RespuestasIt will be fun if all of sudden all 50+ players got an error code and got dc, youre right 😂😂
-
1 Respuesta[quote]Bungie, if you are smart, then put in a battle royale mode to save this dying game. It’s the only things that has already saved tons of other games when they were struggling to survive. Don’t have it be a PvP thing though. Make it so In the battle royale mode we fight bots/NPC enemies so that all players can win instead of just a couple of no-life try hards constantly stomping everyone else and being the only people to get rewards. Think about it.[/quote] Lol
-
7 Respuestas
-
1 RespuestaPeople complain about lag with just 6 players. You want 100+ playing together? Don't think it will work.
-
1 Respuesta[quote]Bungie, if you are smart, then put in a battle royale mode to save this dying game.[/quote] Wikipedia: [quote]Battle royale games involve dozens to hundreds of players, who start with minimal equipment and then must eliminate all other opponents while avoiding being trapped outside of a shrinking "safe area", with the winner being the last player or team alive.[/quote] [quote]Don’t have it be a PvP thing though. Make it so In the battle royale mode we fight bots/NPC enemies so that all players can win instead of just a couple of no-life try hards constantly stomping everyone else and being the only people to get rewards.[/quote] Someone got fed up with losing in Fortnite and wants a Battle Royale with no player enemies and no singular winner. Sounds like strikes with extra steps
-
If they add BR, I’m filing a lawsuit.
-
1 Respuestan1 joke
-
1 RespuestaForgot the satire tag
-
1 RespuestaYeah, you're playing the wrong game if you think this is the answer going forward.