{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/28/2016 3:16:06 AM
8
Doctrine vs blind perdition
based on the damage and fire rate of the new pulse rifles such as the waltz, cryptic dragon, and blind perdition do they need to be brought to the same standing as doctrine and auto rifles of the same archetype, or do the doctrine archetype weapons need to be brought back to where they were in year 2?
-
You saying that the doctrine and the grasp are the same because they have the highest RoF of the class? I'm done, not comparable. That grasp has range, doctrine don't. The TTK of the doctrine at close range is faster at close range. They are completely diferent.
-
2 RespuestasYour title confuse I. Either you're comparing autos or scouts. I mean, you can compare apples and oranges, but then you get that PPAP weirdo. It's a matter of preference anyway. I've used my Doctrine enough to appreciate it, and my Inward Lamp to know I don't like it that much. Any RoF higher than MIDA starts to be cumbersome.
-
6 RespuestasHonestly the doctrine is the lowest skill primary in all of year 2 with the exception of the uni remote
-
8 RespuestasBlind Perdition is the Hawksaw Archtype.
-
Doctrine type is fine as is. The nerf took off, what? A single point of damage? High impact autos and pulses though...
-
14 RespuestasSmart guy talking. Yes, make HROF autos good again. Something to compete against the pulses. Great idea. Weapon diversity might just occur if guns were buffed instead of nerfed. Nothing new here. Just the way the game is.
-
4 RespuestasFYI. Blind perdition is in the hawksaw archtype. Not the grasp or clever dragons
-
1 RespuestaThese high rof pulse shoot just as fast as autod, but kill faster and out range them and are just easier to use. Why would you ever use a doctrine over a grasp or clever when they cause the same flinch but kill so much faster
