{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/13/2016 8:15:19 PM
1
[quote]If you think they aren't being tracked, then you are out of your mind because it is a fact- not a guess- that they are. It's an incredibly obvious and well accepted fact.[/quote]
Explain where this came from.
English
-
And again- avoiding all the points you can't face and fixating. Alas. Still, I'll play along. [quote]Actually you're more than likely wrong, bungie doesn't do weekly updates on who's been logging on or not so that's irrelevant.. also, they already sold the game and logging on to play 7 matches does absolutely nothing for their profits. You're trying to fabricate yet another negative because that's typically what gets a buzz or a "15 minutes of forum fame" post.[/quote]
-
OP [quote]I hate to post this shit but I'm calling bungie out here. That free 320 ghost is desperate marketing at its finest. I guess player log in time has been decreasing of late (no duh, where is our PvE content) bc throwing a 320 item out for free will certainly get people to come back even if it is just to get 7 matches completed. Then bungie can have an article posted about how log in rate has never been higher.[/quote] My response [quote]Actually you're more than likely wrong, bungie doesn't do weekly updates on who's been logging on or not so that's irrelevant.. also, they already sold the game and logging on to play 7 matches does absolutely nothing for their profits. You're trying to fabricate yet another negative because that's typically what gets a buzz or a "15 minutes of forum fame" post.[/quote][/quote] You seem to have a correlation failure between the OP and what I responded with. The moment you started being wrong. [quote]If you think they aren't being tracked, then you are out of your mind because it is a fact- not a guess- that they are. It's an incredibly obvious and well accepted fact.[/quote] So again, explain how your response fits in here. Point out exactly where I said I believe Bungie doesn't track and if you think it's: [quote]bungie doesn't do weekly updates on who's been logging on or not so that's irrelevant..[/quote] Then you're simply wrong.
-
[quote] You seem to have a correlation failure between the OP and what I responded with.[/quote]You'll note I never commented on what the thread maker posted. I only commented on what you posted. You seem to have a correlation failure between what I said and what you think I said. I suggest rereading the context of the post. [quote] The moment you started being wrong.[/quote]Fixation. [quote]So again, explain how your response fits in here.[/quote]Exactly how it says. [quote] Point out exactly where I said I believe Bungie doesn't track and if you think it's: [/quote] [quote] Then you're simply wrong.[/quote]Well since that's the line, and you started arguing that point a few posts in, it leads to the conclusion that I am in fact correct, and you are trying to cover your bum after being called on it. Nothing wrong with that inherently- just when you start acting rude to others over it, that's when you cross a line.
-
Editado por Polo147: 2/13/2016 9:28:10 PM[quote]You'll note I never commented on what the thread maker posted. I only commented on what you posted.[/quote] Lmao which is exactly why you're wrong.
-
Editado por Polo147: 2/13/2016 10:11:37 PMReplied to self
-
Which is exactly why you're wrong, as you insist of comparing my reply as if I were replying to someone else.
-
Me [quote]Lmao which is exactly why you're wrong.[/quote] You [quote]Which is exactly why you're wrong, as you insist of comparing my reply as if I were replying to someone else.[/quote] You earlier [quote]Unfortunately, the 'I know you are but what am I' argument doesn't do you much credit.[/quote] Guess we can see if you agree with your own words now. You're pretty much reading my response to the OP as a singular thought instead of comprehending the correlation between the OP and myself so as long as you fail to find the correlation between my response and the OP you're pretty much stuck being an idiot.
-
[quote] Guess we can see if you agree with your own words now.[/quote]The difference being you simply said 'yes' when I said 'no.' That was the entirely of your post. I followed up with reasoning behind it. So we have here you arguing not the topic, but yet again simply trying to ''score points'' in an irrelevant comment. Not only that, but your comment further showed you lack understanding of what was actually said. All in all, not your best day. [quote]You're pretty much reading my response to the OP as a singular thought instead of comprehending the correlation between the OP and myself so as long as you fail to find the correlation between my response and the OP[/quote]I don't talk about what the thread maker said because what he said was irrelevant to my post. Yes, I understand you were replying to him. However, I was replying to [i]you[/i]. Your post is the relevant one here mate. The sooner you understand that, the sooner you'll be able to move on with your life. [quote] you're pretty much stuck being an idiot.[/quote]You're yet again being very rude, attacking me as a person. There's no reasoning for that, and it's childish.
-
Me [quote]Lmao which is exactly why you're wrong.[/quote] You [quote]Which is exactly why you're wrong, as you insist of comparing my reply as if I were replying to someone else.[/quote] You earlier [quote]Unfortunately, the 'I know you are but what am I' argument doesn't do you much credit.[/quote] Guess we can see if you agree with your own words now. Trying again to take something out of context, it's not about the simple fact of me saying yes and you saying no. You specifically said this type of arguement "doesn't do you much credit." Now you're using the exact same arguement so does the arguement do anyone credit or not? Simply answer the question
-
Editado por burritosenior: 2/14/2016 1:43:23 AM[quote]Trying again to take something out of context,[/quote]You say I took something out of context, then you drop that line of thought entirely. You don't get to just make a statement like that then move onto something else. Not if you want your statement to be taken seriously, anyway. [quote] it's not about the simple fact of me saying yes and you saying no. [/quote]Yes, it is. In a playground, if a kid says 'you are an idiot' and the other kid says 'I know you are but what am I,' the kid did not use an argument that helps him at all. But if he instead replies, 'I can tell you that you are the idiot because you were unable to talk about the actual topic and instead resorted to attacking me,' then that second kid has evolved the argument by backing it up with fact, giving him a leg to stand on as opposed to the first kid. [quote] You specifically said this type of arguement "doesn't do you much credit."[/quote]Which is doesn't. Hence why it made you look pretty silly. [quote] Now you're using the exact same arguement so does the arguement do anyone credit or not?[/quote] The first half of that question is the premise of a faulty assumption, invalidating the question. It's like if I asked, "Since grass is red, do you think it looks like ketchup?' It's nonsensical. [quote] Simply answer the question[/quote]The argument 'I know you are but what am I' does not. Hence why I threw your own words back at you with an explanation behind them instead, adding to the argument turning it into an actual point worth discussing. I also note you dropped all pretense of having a clue what this topic was about and have instead invested 100% of your efforts into a completely and irrelevant line of thought. Simply in an attempt to save some face after being called out on a silly statement. Unfortunately for you, that just makes it look all the more silly.
-
Nope, I'm keeping it very simple for you because you like to get on tangents unrelated to my original response. So you agree that the type of argument you refer to as the "I know you are but what am I argument" has no bearing what so ever. No other explanation was needed when I said yes because the fact remains that you STILL think I believe Bungie doesn't track which again, is incorrect. The basis of your entire argument rests on that assumption so again we're going to simply this process for you. Do you still think that I believe Bungie doesn't track based on my original response to the OP?
-
Editado por burritosenior: 2/14/2016 1:41:25 AM[quote]Nope, I'm keeping it very simple for you because you like to get on tangents unrelated to my original response. [/quote]You dedicated multiple posts to calling me an idiot instead of talking about your original response, mate. [quote]So you agree that the type of argument you refer to as the "I know you are but what am I argument" has no bearing what so ever.[/quote]No 'bearing?' You're the one that used it, mate. If it has no bearing then why did you use it? [quote] the fact remains that you STILL think I believe Bungie doesn't track which again, is incorrect. [/quote] I don't 'still think' anything. You've now admitted you were wrong. That's fine. [quote] No other explanation was needed when I said yes[/quote]You still said the equivalent of, 'I know you are but what am I?' [quote]The basis of your entire argument rests on that assumption so again we're going to simply this process for you.[/quote]Not much of an assumption. [quote] Do you still think that I believe Bungie doesn't track based on my original response to the OP?[/quote]You've shown you knew you were wrong, so my answer would be, 'no.'
-
OK so now that your answer is "No" to the question I asked hours ago. What was I wrong about?
-
Editado por burritosenior: 2/14/2016 1:45:03 AM[quote]OK so now that your answer is "No" to the question I asked hours ago.[/quote]My answer hasn't changed until you changed your mind. [quote]What was I wrong about?[/quote]Your first post, and multiple posts since then, if you want to count those.
-
What's wrong with my first post?
-
[quote]They absolutely track the number of players. They do so on an hourly basis, not a weekly basis. You don't have much knowledge of the industry if you think otherwise, mate. And if you are saying they don't care about the number of players because it doesn't help profits... are you serious? Aside from the obvious fact that they introduced microtransactions into the game which means they need to keep players invested in the world, Destiny itself was advertised as a constantly evolving and updating world. If players do not continually like what Bungie does with that world, players will not make future purchases and the promises made in the sale of the first game will prove fruitless.[/quote]
-
Ok but point out in MY post where I said they don't track the number of players. OR point out where I said they do not care about the number of players.
-
[quote]Ok but point out in MY post where I said they don't track the number of players. [/quote] [quote]Actually you're more than likely wrong, bungie doesn't do weekly updates on who's been logging on or not so that's irrelevant.. also, they already sold the game and logging on to play 7 matches does absolutely nothing for their profits. You're trying to fabricate yet another negative because that's typically what gets a buzz or a "15 minutes of forum fame" post.[/quote]
-
That's the full post, so what part of that post says that they don't track the number of players?
-
[quote]Actually you're more than likely wrong, bungie doesn't do weekly updates on who's been logging on or not so that's irrelevant.. also, they already sold the game and logging on to play 7 matches does absolutely nothing for their profits. [/quote]
-
Also, I played 7 matches today so how exactly did I add to their profit..?
-
[quote]Also, I played 7 matches today so how exactly did I add to their profit..?[/quote] [quote]And if you are saying they don't care about the number of players because it doesn't help profits... are you serious? Aside from the obvious fact that they introduced microtransactions into the game which means they need to keep players invested in the world, Destiny itself was advertised as a constantly evolving and updating world. If players do not continually like what Bungie does with that world, players will not make future purchases and the promises made in the sale of the first game will prove fruitless.[/quote]
-
Maybe you're not aware that people only came back to get the valentine exclusives which happen to be free......?
-
I'm sure a good number of people did. That in no way invalidates anything I said.
-
Sure it does, I alone invalidate what you said because my matches added nothing to their profits. The same goes for anyone that strictly came back for the FREE exclusive items from valentines day, everyone that came back ONLY for those items are not adding to Bungie's profits. Unless you're saying that this Valentine's day even is what will sell Destiny 2 lmfao.
