{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/22/2015 1:22:09 PM
3
I think that for items to be traded, they must be equal in a new form of value, made up just for the trading system.
Perhaps make it based on public demand. For example:
You could not trade a No Land Beyond for a Gjallarhorn because No Land Beyonds Trade Demand value is 2/5 while Gjallarhorns is 5/5.
You could trade a Hawkmoon for a Gjallarhorn because both trade values are a 5/5.
That's just a BS example but I think that would need to be implemented to prohibit people from trading away their useless exotics for more desirable things.
English
-
This is unfair because what I'd the only exotic you are missing is for example the 4th horseman and you had a duplicate g horn and wanted to trade ( not my situation I still need the g horn )
-
But that opens up people taking advantage. Someone can say I will give you $100 and my invective for your Gjallerhorn. If you could only trade items of equal demand it would work better. I think any trading is bad though
-
Yeah I don't think any trading is going to work at all I was just saying why the method you put forwards wouldn't be fair either so I agree with you on that
