{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/24/2020 12:28:13 PM
67
Makes more sense for police to be armed and citizens not than vice versa.
Why is that?
Training and responsibility.
English
-
[quote]Makes more sense for police to be armed and citizens not than vice versa. Why is that? Training and responsibility.[/quote] You can be responsible and get training even if you dont work for a police department.
-
[quote]Makes more sense for police to be armed and citizens not than vice versa. Why is that? Training and responsibility.[/quote] False. The vice versa you imply is that citizens are armed but police officers are not. You make a straw man argument.
-
So by. Straw man do you mean it’s actually true because I’m making a satirical point that obviously a fully armed society against a completely unarmed police force is just ridiculous 🙄 Not exactly what a straw man is but it’s all I can presume 🧐
-
[quote]So by. Straw man do you mean it’s actually true because I’m making a satirical point that obviously a fully armed society against a completely unarmed police force is just ridiculous 🙄[/quote] False. Unless you indicate you are being satirical or sarcastic within the same comment, it is valid for others to take you at case value. You make a Schrodinger comment, where you can claim to take it back or not depending on how your comment is received by others. It demonstrates your lack of conviction. [quote]Not exactly what a straw man is but it’s all I can presume 🧐[/quote] You made a straw man argument.
-
Editado por SWED420: 1/24/2020 9:21:08 PMI took nothing back, my hypothesis remained valid. Satire or sarcasm can and were used to emphasize a truth, not too make some meaningless joke. And again no where can I see this straw man, I have an explanation not an argument 🙄 Edit. Word
-
It's hard to tell if somethings satire unless I write it.
-
[quote]I took nothing back, my hypothesis remained valid. Satire or sarcasm can and were used to emphasize a truth, not too make some meaningless joke. And again no where can I see this straw man, I have an explanation not an argument 🙄 Edit. Word[/quote] False. No one in favor of defending their right to bear arms has ever made the argument you made. It is a straw man argument that you put forth.
-
I thought police were racists that shoot black people on sight... You really want people like that with guns? The agenda is exposed...
-
That also needs to be on the to do list. Better behaved piggies 🐷 It’s a big list 🙄
-
[quote]That also needs to be on the to do list. Better behaved piggies 🐷 It’s a big list 🙄[/quote] It’s super easy to say that but GL implementing it.
-
Yup good luck indeed 🤞
-
How would you propose doing that in areas where they’re desperate for police officer hires?
-
Editado por SWED420: 1/24/2020 8:41:41 PMDo your police have body cams that record everything? Makes being a duck a bit harder. And offers protection to an honest cop. Either way that’s one thing and it ain’t my job to help remove racism from American police 🙄
-
You make the claim only police should have guns. I’m putting your belief to the test. Apparently it’s flimsy. Also it’s easy AF to “lose” the video.
-
And no you can’t lose the video. That is highly suspicious if claims are raised against you
-
[quote]And no you can’t lose the video. That is highly suspicious if claims are raised against you[/quote] *insert Jeff Epstein joke*
-
Indeed. Don’t get that shit over here 🤦♂️ Well I’m sure there is, it’s just hidden more cleverly 😉🇬🇧
-
[quote]Indeed. Don’t get that shit over here 🤦♂️ Well I’m sure there is, it’s just hidden more cleverly 😉🇬🇧[/quote] It’s like Hoth said. It’s ironic that a British person is telling an American that only government employees should own/have firearms. L. O. L.
-
Well certain sectors, police, military. Also I’d happily support many private security firms, places need security. Just not bobs discount gun store 🙄
-
[quote]Well certain sectors, police, military. Also I’d happily support many private security firms, places need security. Just not bobs discount gun store 🙄[/quote] What makes police, military, or private security personnel qualified to have guns? The same training classes I could take on weekends?
-
No a newer much more intensive training course with heavy mental evaluations
-
[quote]No a newer much more intensive training course with heavy mental evaluations[/quote] The mental evaluations arent that heavy though. And typical police [u]firearm[/u] training isnt that intensive. It's not like we need to spend weeks studying criminal procedure, understanding due process, knowing what a PIT maneuver is etc.
-
And a course in real English spellings and real football would help too 🙌😊
-
[quote]Well certain sectors, police, military. Also I’d happily support many private security firms, places need security. Just not bobs discount gun store 🙄[/quote] British employed Mercs too in the revolutionary war. Don’t be a buzzkill.
-
War is something else entirely. Not something we should plan out daily lives around for sure.
