{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Editado por Venom:
3/17/2016 4:02:28 AM
22
I agree while these idiots don't understand I think 3v3 game modes shouldn't have heavy like rumble or skirmish you can turn a game around with heavy which you shouldn't be able to do or maybe just trials shouldn't have it
English
-
I've lost so many rumble games because of heavy it's sickening I'd have 2200 points the 2nd place guy has 1700 and comes back and wins it's the worst
-
In this case they shouldn't have supers either, right? Seriously, will this complaining and crying ever stop? It's far beyond ridiculous.
-
idiot noticed and muted
-
hahaha! bye bye cry baby.
-
Yeah, as if somebody cared. And that nice try of an insult is generously ignored.
-
Editado por Ash: 3/17/2016 12:55:35 PMSupers don't last entire games. Heavy breaks 3v3. Supers is a thing everyone eventually has access to while heavy can be taken by one team and it's almost a guaranteed loss
-
Heavies don't last an entire game either. They only last as long as you have ammo. They only last until the end of a match, if you barely or not use them at all. In which case the entire argument is invalid anyways. Matter of fact is, heavies are part of the game. And they are available to each and every player. If some don't like it, so be it. They're not forced to use them. But in this case they're better off not complaining about being in a disadvantage.
-
Qullims terminus can easily last from the first heavy to the end of the game. Heavy ammo has no place in 3v3 2v2 or rumble as it is to powerful with such small teams.
-
Editado por dkp1977: 3/17/2016 4:51:37 PMSo what? Grab a heavy weapon of your choice, pick up some ammo for it and run rampant. Chances are equal for everyone. I still don't see a problem there. Machine Gun's range is quite limited, same goes for swords. And rockets can be dodged rather easily.
-
Machine guns range is limited but the maps are designed for close quarters combat. You can't pick up heavy if the enemy team supers you before you have your super. I also try not to use heavy ammo because I can usually win without it, doesn't change the fact that it's unbalanced. If you want to run rampant with it you can play 6v6 were everyone is bad
-
1) If you decide not to use heavy for whatever reason, it is YOUR choice. That may put you in a certain disadvantage, but you purposely chose to accept that. 2) If your opponents super you before YOU have your super ready, you made a very basic mistake. Always save your super for heavies. Don't waste it for anything else. 3) Close combat or not, you can still avoid being nuked. 4) No, if you want to run rampant in a 3 vs. 3 match, feel free to do so. Why? Because you can and are somehow even encouraged to. Because otherwise there'd be no heavy crates at all. I really don't get why your complaining about missing balance here. It were a balancing issue if only one team could access the heavy supplies, but that's not the case. They're available to both teams. It's up to the teams to ensure getting their hands on them, thus increasing the chance to get the upper hand in the match.
-
It's weird, the worse the player is the more they defend things that are clearly not wanted or wanted to be changed. All the decent players I talk to want heavy and revive shields gone but all the mediocre to bad players want them to stay. My theory is that mediocre to bad players like to use them as a way to make them feel like a good player.
-
It's kinda cute how guys like you always start to insult others or come up with how bad a player is and how much he lacks skill, as soon as you run out of arguments. But congratulations to you for those wannabe facts you tried and made up. The fact aside that you haven't discussed this matter with each and every PvP player, so your statistic is irrelevant from the get go anyways, my stats don't even matter the slightest in this debate. I don't need heavy weapons to feel like a good player. Tbh, I couldn't care less. It's a game. It doesn't change shit about what I achieved in life. Which is what really matters. Heavies are part of this game's mechanics. You don't like it? I'm sure you'll find other games that suit you more. For you I may be one who needs heavies to feel like a good player, but for me you are one of those who got killed by heavies and needs to turn to the forums to shed some tears about how unfair this is. In the end this is just another cry for nerfs. Ridiculous.
-
I can feel my brain cells commiting suicide one by one after reading that wall of garbage.
-
Here come the insults, just as predicted. Thank you for proving my point. Highly appreciated.
-
Oh cause you didn't insult me?
-
Because I tried to counter your arguments instead of completely ignoring them, making insults and referring to stats that don't have the slightest relevance in this disucssion.
-
No shit. Whiner nubs want to turn this game into a 1980's shooter where everyone uses the same gun and that's it.
-
dumbass noticed muted
-
They'd still find something to cry about. What they really want is some sort of compensation for their lack of skill which helps them gain the upper hand over their opponents. I'm not a skilled PvP player either, but I know it's that lack of skill, me not being as good as my opponents, and not special/heavy crates, that wannabe meta or gear.
-
You can't tell that the pre-teens on this forum though. Mommy said they were special and mommy is never wrong. So it must be the stupid guns that suck.
-
Somebody should try some heavy on those mommies I guess. ;)
