{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/13/2015 12:56:51 AM
17
Agreed. In-game storyline is great. Bethesda always delivers and doesn't skimp on content.
English
-
It's funny. Everyone on here seems to contradict user reviews on steam. Doesn't sound like game of the year at all. Let us know how deep and complex it is after one week.
-
User reviews especially if your basing it off of Metacritic are mostly bs trolls. There is no chance in hell all those 5s and 0s are reliable reviews. The game doesnt deserve anything less than an 8. Beside most of those people dont own the game or havent even played it. Do not base your decision on a game off of those reviews. They are complete B S.
-
They are not off of meta critic. They are from respected steam user reviewers. Where you can verify how much people have actually played games. So yeah. These are not bs troll posters.
-
Rule of thumb on steam reviews: pretend it's opposite day
-
And of course there are NO bs trolls here - lol 😉
-
Editado por AlamoCity: 11/14/2015 3:28:57 AMOther than a few bugs, I've been content with Fallout 4 so far. The amont of content alone seems overwhelming, but keeps you in the game.
-
Editado por mflynn0351: 11/14/2015 3:27:20 AMThat seems legit. And by no means are people saying the game lacks content. Nor that the game sucks. Just that by fallout standards it is lacking and not a need to buy Goty. And of course I haven't played it yet. Just going off what vetted users have said (you can see how often and what games steam players/curators have played).
-
Just imagine if Bethesda replaced Bungie and released Destiny. Highly possible it would be the best game ever
-
Bethesda specialise in single player, open world RPGs where they don't need to worry about mudflation. Doesn't anyone remember the various 'cheats' you could employ to fast-track skills to insane levels really quickly. None of that is game breaking in a single player world, but for an MMO you have all sorts of balance issues. Even Dark Souls/Bloodbourne have severe balance issues and they have VERY limited multi player. You can't compare a rich single player RPG to an MMO. We can compare Destiny's shooter mechanics to CoD/Halo/etc. and its MMO aspects to WoW et. al. But in reality, Destiny still stands apart as possibly the only RPG/FPS/MMO (yes yes, I know, Warframe). Comparing Destiny to Fallout 4 is like compare an apple to a bicycle.
-
None of us are comparing the two games.. We are just debating which game company could really please gamers with Destiny.
-
Editado por AlamoCity: 11/13/2015 1:29:41 PMEspecially with the open world element. It's massive. Bungie promised an open explorable world in Destiny but failed to deliver.
-
Of course Bethesda would deliver a much richer single player game. As for multiplayer mechanics and balance, the game would be shit.
-
Fallout is PvE focused and really has no need for multiplayer. Very few games have well balanced multiplayer and Destiny is far from that ideal.
-
Bungie thought it would be easier than what it turned out to be. Bungie are guilty of over estimating their ability (aaaaand then covering it up and lying about it)
-
-
Editado por MatrixasISeeFit: 11/13/2015 6:53:38 AMShit yeah.
-
Preach it ^^
