{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/3/2012 12:54:45 AM
52
Did Bungie mean to end the Halo series with Halo 3?
Let me elaborate. I'm wondering if Bungie meant for the Halo 3 ending to be the true ending to the Halo series, that 343's Halo games would mean nothing. Did Bungie leave the Halo 3 ending unexplained so that 343 could continue it, or did they do it to bring the "true" Halo story to a close that was up for interpretation? Will Bungie consider the next Halo games to be true Halo?
I've been wondering what Bungie thinks of 343 continuing the series, that is unless Bungie meant to close the Halo story with the third installment.
Uh...discuss where you think 343 is going with the next Halo games.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NiRaC4ntSnip3 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] SEAL Sniper 9 Legendary ending. /thread They contemplated making Halo 4 rather than Reach (thank God they didn't).[/quote] Well of course they contemplated it. I think the point is, did they [i]want[/i] to make Halo 4? As I see it, they left the possibility open because of Microsoft's demands, but didn't want to.[/quote] As has been said, they originally wanted too, but they didn't want to, nor could they, have done the necessary sequels. Knowing it would take more than one game, they went with Reach instead.
