If the fossil record is not evidence for evolution then I give up.
English
-
That's not what he was implying. Fossil records alone do not explain Darwinian evolution. Only when the fossils are backed with further proof which links them, can they be used as proof.
-
Is that what I said? No.
-
Are our fellow Bungie.Net members dyslexic? I hope so, because the alternative is much less attractive.
-
Blind perhaps?