{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by M37h3w3:
10/7/2014 7:20:46 AM
11
The entire scenario is a cluster-blam!- of stupid anyways.
MS and Sony for outputting such weak consoles to start with and the consumers for demanding 1080 and 60 FPS just because it's the next generation of consoles when unless your screen size is big enough or you sit close enough to the screen, the difference between 720 and 1080 is negligable. Same shit with the god forsaken 60 FPS.
1080 and 60 FPS doesn't bump a shit tier game to god tier status. So long as the technical specs meet at least baseline requirements, how many pixels can be crammed into the screen or how many times the screen refreshes means -blam!- all.
It's the story, the characters, the in game mechanics that matter.
Crysis was a shit franchise whose sole selling point was that it was a PC melter. TF2 pales in graphical comparison but has been FAR more profitable and just outright FUN.
English
-
Edited by Prophet of Hater: 10/8/2014 3:14:40 AMThe truth has been spoken, who gives a shit if it's 60 frames per sec, the graphics are fine and the frames per sec don't matter to the gameplay, slightly above average graphics is enough to satisfy me
-
The difference between 30fps and 60fps isn't negligible. It's a big difference compared to the difference between 720p and 1080p.
-
Edited by Salclyon: 10/7/2014 7:26:17 PM[quote]The difference between 30fps and 60fps isn't negligible. It's a big difference compared to the difference between 720p and 1080p.[/quote] This is true once I got a PC and played some of the same games I did on console the difference in frame rate is very noticeable it's a whole lot smoother at 60 fps than 30 fps
-
If CoD still runs at 60 FPS then I don't notice the difference at all when I'm playing.
-
Edited by BritLemon: 10/7/2014 7:08:40 AMIt's a big difference. If you go from a 30fps shooter like Halo to a 60fps shooter like CoD, then you'll notice it.
-
Edited by M37h3w3: 10/7/2014 7:25:19 AMLike I said; I don't notice it. The benefits of 60 FPS falls under the same category as 1080; Providing better picture quality if you're close enough to the screen or the screen is big enough. Miss both of those marks and then the benefit tapers off. The other benefit of 60 FPS in shooters (see actions quicker so you can react quicker) are so fringe that it's barely worth mentioning. Just about the only point I can concede is that the difference between 30 and 60 FPS is more noticeable to more people. Then again it might just be in their heads and it's just embers burning from the Halo-CoD fanboi war.
-
Then you should probably book an appointment with your optician.
-
Edited by M37h3w3: 10/7/2014 7:53:57 AMWhy? My vision is fine. Oh wait... you're trying to imply that I'm blind by being clever and using word play. Oh well -blam!-. You should have told me that you were going to be a dick and I would have just jumped straight to being a dick in return.
-
Edited by BritLemon: 10/7/2014 8:04:38 AMI'm not being a dick. [url=http://www.30vs60fps.com/]30fps vs 60fps[/url] [url=http://gfycat.com/PaltryMiniatureConey]30fps vs 60fps[/url] [url=https://frames-per-second.appspot.com/]Here's one you can play around with[/url] If you can't see the difference in any of these, then there's obviously something wong with your eyes. Either that or you've only got a shitty 30Hz TV.
-
[spoiler]Good comparison with SoM Lemon :3 [/spoiler]
-
They're both pretty noticeable to me, although not a necessity. I'm pretty happy about the MCC being 60 FPS.
