So I just beat bioshock infinite, and it was amazing, so now I'm playing through the original before I buy burial at sea. I want to know the complete storyline before playing burial at sea, so should I play bioshock 2, or would just looking up a plot summary suffice? I've heard it's not that good
English
#Gaming
-
1 ReplyDefinitely. The best I would say.
-
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Don't listen. It is [b]not[/b] a bioshock game.
-
Hell mutha -blam!-ing yeah
-
It's good. I would definitely recommend playing it after the original.
-
It's the best game in the series since infinite. Buy it or hell will have a special place waiting for you
-
I mean it's so cheap now, it's a good game. So yes, buy it
-
Its good the gameplay is fast paced like infinite but is not as good as one or infinite its still fun and rapture isn't as unforgiving of the last. It adds to the lore and gives back story the city also feels more alive in this one and its is connected to the first.Also it has multiplayer witch is fun. I would recommended Bioshock 2 only after you played the other two
-
Honestly never played it but supposedly Minerva's Den is really good
-
Edited by Egerspurge: 4/14/2014 1:00:18 AMOnly if you ignore it's complete retconning of the first game's story and Lamb's total poopfaceness.
-
1 ReplyThe second one's plot is barley connected to the other two if that is what you're concerned about. There is no reference to it at all in the B@S DLCs.
-
Ok cool
-
It's the best one/ [spoiler]opiiiinnniiiomnnn[/spoiler]
-
Ok so I wouldn't be confused playing burial at sea without 2
-
Unfortunately, Burial at Sea doesn't reference Bio2 at all, as though it's some dirty outcast just because Irrational didn't make it. And whilst it's bereft of Irrational's storytelling subtlety, it's still a fantastic game, with better gameplay than its already incredible predecessor. Except for the hacking. I prefer Bio1 for that.