Porn can be harmful. Bad parenting is always more harmful. Pay attention to what your kids are doing.
English
#Offtopic
-
17 RepliesThis doesn't surprise me at all. A 8 year old in America played doctor with the daughter of a politician and was put on the sex offender's list.
-
He got owned by the FBI.
-
How retarded. Dailymail.
-
[quote]Jamie watched his first pornographic sec scene when he was aged just 10 - and he became hooked[/quote] The Securities and Exchange Commission can be remarkably addictive.
-
good lord, I couldn't even finish that article.
-
You know, I'm only 16 and I've seen enough increasingly grotesque and disturbing images to know that there truly is no such thing as having "seen it all." Maybe I'm just somehow steeled against this stuff, but I've never really liked anything past normal softcore stuff. I'm lead to believe that some people already have these fantasies locked away (as children, wires may be crossed in their mind from some external input, and the problems only surface during puberty,) and viewing these kinds of images turns a key in their mind that turns it into a kink. But I dunno.
-
Edited by Ad Hoc: 2/7/2014 9:59:29 PMThat's ridiculous. He's only 13! Puberty is a very confusing time and he shouldn't have his life ruined because he did something stupid as a kid. He should be sent to counseling. He should be watched more carefully. But he should NOT be a registered sex offender.
-
5 Replies[quote]Another example would be Paul, 12. He has been referred to us because his obsessive sexual viewing habits have now spilled into the real world. At school, he has been repeatedly exposing himself to teachers and other pupils in lessons.[/quote] #LAD
-
I don't understand why parents didn't educate this before hand. You know, give him warning signs?
-
Edited by Doctor Orange: 2/7/2014 6:05:21 PMRead about a quarter of the article. That's kind of an overreaction to do that to a 13 year old. It's really not his fault. Time for parents to learn the Internets. Unless they were watching it with him. In which case hell yeah family bonding time. But really. Wtf. Ridiculous.
-
Edited by M37h3w3: 2/7/2014 6:00:01 PMI'm of the persuasion that as it stands, the Sex Offender Registry either needs to be made private and accessible by only the police, or this kid needs to be removed from it. Preferably both. Because this kid's life is -blam!-ed now. -blam!-ed all because he made a bad mistake as a kid. He will never have a normal life now. Ten years from now nobody is going to give two shits that he did something he didn't know he wasn't supposed to be doing as a child. All they are going to see is "Sex Offender" and then decline him the job. "Sex Offender" and then decline renting the room to him. Provided he can even rent there given how every idiot Soccer Mom and White Upper Middle Class Family says "Not in my backyard!" and drive him, with pitchforks and torches, into the worst part of town before making that place impossible to live in and force him to be homeless.
-
Isn't it a little unfair to put the kid on the sex offenders registry?
-
1 ReplyWhy did the police start knocking on his door?
-
Edited by Trevelyan: 2/7/2014 6:20:14 PMThree years? Boy, that kid got some numb dick action going. Seriously though, I blame the parents.
-
5 RepliesI blame the parents.
-
[quote][b]animals[/b], children, stabbing and strangling[/quote] Must be from Wales. Them Welsh folk are rather stranger
-
Sucks for him
-
1 Reply"women being humiliated and degraded" Made it to there. I'm out. Screw the Daily Mail.
-
1 ReplyDaily Mail? Prepare for everyone to attack your source.