{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/31/2013 9:32:14 PM
62
Why exactly is Halo 3's ending a "Satisfying Conclusion"?
I've seen people say this all the time and I struggle to understand why. Not only is it just leaving Cortana to rot out in space after we just spend an entire game trying to rescue her, but Mendicant Bias pretty much tells you that Chief's story isn't over yet. Hell, it fails to address twelve or thirteen major plot points left over.
"Finish the Fight" my arse
-
Edited by IVI1CR0S0F7: 1/1/2014 12:20:16 AMIt was a satisfying ending for a game. As a conclusion to a story? Hell no. Like the others said, there were a lot of questions left unanswered purposely. Halo was never meant to end with 3.
