{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/24/2013 12:19:13 PM
2
I would get the plans, shoot them a few times and throw them in an eternally burning fire. I would then divert the entire 343i budget into time travel research and development, in order to go back and stop the monster that was Halo 4, from ever being created. I would then get together all of the employees of Bungie and the Xbox division of Microsoft and bash their heads together until they agreed upon making the final Halo game as Bungie would have intended.
English
-
>as Bungie would have intended >implying that wouldn't be just as bad, perhaps significantly worse, considering Reach
-
I honestly don't see what was wrong with Reach. To me it has one of the most enjoyable Halo campaigns, and a fantastic forge mode. I think that if Bungie just completely skipped Reach and made Halo 4 using the same graphics and the same engine, it would have looked and played really well. The multiplayer on the other hand was an entirely different story. I wish it could have been more like Halo 2/3, with some of those new shitty weapons cut out, save for the plasma launcher.
