{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/30/2013 11:32:57 PM
48
The common Halo fanboy fallacy.
"Fewer people like Halo: Reach? B-but it's a fantastic game!"
"Halo needs to innovate, not stay in the past!"
"Significantly fewer people like Halo 4? B-but it's a good game!"
"Halo needs to innovate, not stay in the past!"
"Nobody's playing Halo anymore?"
"Well, I guess Halo just isn't popular anymore."
I keep seeing this posted. Dumbasses want "innovation", yet look where it's gotten the franchise? Not only this, but these idiots have the audacity to turn around and tell me that the Halo franchise is no longer popular like it used to be.
It's one thing to have a preference for Halo: Reach or Halo 4, but another to turn around, slap pro-Halo 2/3 fans in the face with "m-muh innovation!", and say "well, I guess that's the end of the road for Halo, we should just simply stop asking for it to be great again."
I hope I'm not the only one noticing this bullshit, [b]especially[/b] on places like Waypoint and sometimes even Neogaf.
-
1 ReplyThe ignorant will continue to stay ignorant. They don't know better. Only those of us who came before Reach and Halo 4 really know what Halo was and is and what innovation for the series should be like. I always found it funny they made up all those hilarious statements despite the proof of Halo's decline and how the 'innovation' has failed them. Halo 1, 2, and 3 are all different games and changed over time, that was good innovation. This post Reach crap will forever poison Halo. We no longer have a game based on skill but cheap gimmicks to let players get away with crap they never could in previous games. And no, those that dislike Reach.Halo 4 are not bad at them. They are too easy of a game and thats the issue. No challenge and no satisfaction in winning. Why play that when I can play Halo 3 and earn exp winning games and suffer the actual consequences of quitting or losing? This innovation they speak of is dumbing down Halo more to make it easier for the masses, not to improve satisfaction of skill and rewarding those who do well in matches.
