What so many anti-womaners forget is that the HUMAN LIFE is, at the stages where abortion is legal, something that lacks a brain that contains any vaguely human thought. The fact that it has a heartbeat means nothing. It's life? Of course. Is it valuable life? I'd say no, because it can't feel pain, can't think; it's not a human life, at least not yet. You happily eat meat from an animal that has a heartbeat, and I'm sure it can feel a hell of a lot more pain than the unborn fish thing that is a first trimester fetus. And if you argue that just because it contains the genetic material to eventually become a human, it is human, consider this: Sperm and human ova contain half of the genetic material to create a human. They are, for all intents and purposes, the first stage of beginning a new life. Does that mean that masturbation is mass-murder? Does that mean that a woman having a period is a burial for a neglected life? A line has to be drawn, and it makes sense for the line to be drawn at the point that the fetus can feel pain and conceive thoughts and emotions. The "it wants to live" argument is bullshit as well. Every living creature wants to live. Does that mean we are required to not kill anything? At these early stages of pregnancy, the fetus is less complex a life form than so many other animals, and yet you're trying to frame it like someone's trying to break into a nursery and stab a baby. It's just not that simple.