"We can put chains on animals and make them protect our property, we can literally ride on their backs to travel or just for fun, we can, most importantly, kill them and eat their flesh and that's all fine and dandy, we do it without their consent and very few people seem to mind. If we want to use animals for sex - just another human need - all of a sudden, according to many people, the opinion of the animal starts to matter. That's hypocritical as -blam!-"
You gotta admit they make some good points.
English
#Offtopic
-
1 Replythat dolphin sex
-
1 ReplyFrankly I doubt the animal would mind that as much as it minds being slaughtered, but it says more about the individual that actually wants to have sex with an animal instead of using it to do something productive or to use it as a food source. Also, why make a thread like this?
-
True. I'm all for it. Whatever floats yer boat.
-
Also eating weaker animals is a need of nature.
-
My dog is free to roam not even a collar. Get off my ass.
-
Relevant
-
[url=///] [/url]
-
4 Replies-blam!- is torture. As an animal can't consent, having sex with it counts as -blam!-. Eating animals, chaining them up (to a degree) and riding them (to a degree) isn't torture.
-
3 RepliesI honestly don't give a shit if someone wants to have sex with an animal. It doesn't hurt me in anyway. Well, I take that back, I care if it's one of my pets.
-
Edited by Geth: 7/9/2013 10:15:51 AM
-
It wouldn't be very hygienic. And if you went through the process to make it hygienic, it would just be even weirder.
-
Back in rome and greece etc theres lots of imagery of such things
-
[i] [/i]