So last month the revamped PS+ turned one year old. And in that year for a mere 50 dollars you got over $1000 worth of games, ranging from PS3 to PSP to Vita. 64 titles in all. And that's just one of the benefits of the service, you also get further store discounts, backup game saves, beta accesses, free themes and avatars and more. and people absolutely love it, 96% customer satisfaction.
How can someone possibly say XBL is better? What did you get for paying 60 bucks in that time? Party chat? Dashboard ads? I mean if you love xbox that's fine but why lie to yourselves? Continuing to pay for an inferior product only hurts you as the consumer. Why put up with XBL when the competition is clearly doing more to appeal to gamers?
English
#Gaming
-
Edited by pawncrackers: 7/1/2013 2:40:00 AMOf the few experiences I've had with PS3, I much prefer XBL. Party/video chat, custom soundtracks, seamless online and matchmaking services were an instant sell, and arrived WAY before today's competition - who are still playing catchup, IMO. A percentage of the moneys made from Gold membership goes straight back into maintenance and security - I've never complained, and never will. News of Sony's various security breaches and firmware hacks over the years have put me off. Hopefully, the introduction of PS+ fees will generate some decent revenue, which will be put back in. Sony NEED to establish a more secure service for me to buy their product.