{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/28/2012 6:52:29 PM
223
Germany bans circumcisision = Unhappy people
[url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/27/circumcision-ruling-germany-muslim-jewish]German court rules that procedure is bodily harm and contravenes right to choose religion in later life[/url]
Do you agree with Germany on banning the practice? Do you wish you had the choice of what you wanted to do instead of living with your parents choice?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] FxA Grunteer Ugly dick or Pretty dick? [/quote] All dicks are ugly.
-
I like germany. and i fully agree but.. But.. When i saw "germany bans circumcision". i immediately thought of ww2 -blam!- Germany banning jews.
-
Ugly dick or Pretty dick? Hmmmmmm.
-
Good job Germany.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Addison Stone I think it's a fairly dangerous practice, but Germany putting a ban on a Jewish religious custom? Just don't look good.[/quote]Why the hell are there even Jews in Germany?
-
I think it's a fairly dangerous practice, but Germany putting a ban on a Jewish religious custom? Just don't look good.
-
Circumcision gives you nothing beneficial. while banning is stupid, nothing of value is lost
-
About time a court did something about circumcision. [Edited on 06.28.2012 12:24 PM PDT]
-
[URL=http://www.blogher.com/babies-foreskin-used-make-cosmetics-ethical]Read this blog[/URL] Doctors sell circumcisions for a large sum to certain discerning cosmetic companies... in some reported cases the circumcised their child unknowingly without parent's permission. Read and do research... you can find out on your own. [Edited on 06.28.2012 12:24 PM PDT]
-
Yes, I agree with this.
-
It's really not even a religious practice anymore, at least not as much as it has been in the past. So OK then... [Edited on 06.28.2012 12:18 PM PDT]
-
I don't see a problem with banning the practice of it at birth and allowing it later if the individual chooses to have it done. However banning it at birth even for those who do it as a religious practice is a bit to far. Also lol@lonepaulpretendingheisntandroidspartan [Edited on 06.28.2012 12:15 PM PDT]
-
and the judge completely disregarding "centuries of tradition" argument is just plain stupid. As someone said in the comments, just because it has been going on for a long time that does not make it right.
-
"Germany bans Jewish religious practice" Oh boy.
-
This is an excellent decision.
-
NO A baby can't say "no" and is forced to have his dick cut. Its evil, mutilation and worse then -blam!- because when you're being raped at least you can shout no and you have a chance the dude might listen to you. A small chance but a chance none the less.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Fat Man 3000 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] RECON828 We all know it's you. Just like we all know Chasing a Bee, here, is Teh Chaz.[/quote] Well he isn't exactly hiding it, by using the exact same coup for both accounts.[/quote] I haven't used Coup since coup 4. I just deduced it from how he writes and his insistence on not properly punctuation his sentences.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Deaf Boy [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Android Spartan [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Deaf Boy This is stupid. There are a lot of different things parents do to children that are for their benefit early on in their lives before they know better, such as drug treatments, surgery, and etc. Why should this be outlawed and not the rest? My point is parents do what they think is best, and as long as their is no clear negative outcome of such a procedure (i.e. highly unlikely of something bad happening) than the parents should be able to do so.[/quote]Because if your parents thought cutting the whole thing off to prevent you having kids when your older they should be allowed to have it done? No. Its your body you should choose when your older, most body changed surgeries need consent 1st by the person thats having it. Why should it be different in circumcisision?[/quote] The fact that you are comparing cutting off the entire schlong to circumcision just destroys your credibility. And you also failed to read my post, where I said [b]"as long as their is no clear negative outcome of such a procedure (i.e. highly unlikely of something bad happening) than the parents should be able to do so."[/b] Cutting off the schlong clearly is a negative outcome.[/quote] Significantly less sensitivity of the head leading to much less pleasurably cex is a big enough negative outcome to deem it necessary for people to make their own desicion on whether or not their foreskin should be cut off People with no foreskin just cannot understand just how sensitive the head is meant to be [Edited on 06.28.2012 12:11 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] HALO12325 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] JamieSparkes I agree with it. Just because the parents believe in certain religious practices doesn't mean that the child should have to 'suffer' because of it. [/quote] I didn't suffer...you mad? [/quote]The foreskin has many nerve endings that, when removed, can make -blam!- stimulation less pleasurable. I still remember when I had just hit puberty and had very little knowledge on how my -blam!- worked, I could reach orgasm just by massaging the foreskin without touching the tip or the crown.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] RECON828 We all know it's you. Just like we all know Chasing a Bee, here, is Teh Chaz.[/quote] Well he isn't exactly hiding it, by using the exact same coup for both accounts.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Android Spartan [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Deaf Boy This is stupid. There are a lot of different things parents do to children that are for their benefit early on in their lives before they know better, such as drug treatments, surgery, and etc. Why should this be outlawed and not the rest? My point is parents do what they think is best, and as long as their is no clear negative outcome of such a procedure (i.e. highly unlikely of something bad happening) than the parents should be able to do so.[/quote]Because if your parents thought cutting the whole thing off to prevent you having kids when your older they should be allowed to have it done? No. Its your body you should choose when your older, most body changed surgeries need consent 1st by the person thats having it. Why should it be different in circumcisision?[/quote] The fact that you are comparing cutting off the entire schlong to circumcision just destroys your credibility. And you also failed to read my post, where I said [b]"as long as their is no clear negative outcome of such a procedure (i.e. highly unlikely of something bad happening) than the parents should be able to do so."[/b] Cutting off the schlong clearly is a negative outcome.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] DarkSunnyboy1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] lonepaul2441 Do you wish you had the choice of what you wanted to do instead of living with your parents choice?[/quote] Who doesn't?[/quote]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Deaf Boy This is stupid. There are a lot of different things parents do to children that are for their benefit early on in their lives before they know better, such as drug treatments, surgery, and etc. Why should this be outlawed and not the rest? My point is parents do what they think is best, and as long as their is no clear negative outcome of such a procedure (i.e. highly unlikely of something bad happening) than the parents should be able to do so.[/quote]Because if your parents thought cutting the whole thing off to prevent you having kids when your older they should be allowed to have it done? No. Its your body you should choose when your older, most body changed surgeries need consent 1st by the person thats having it. Why should it be different in circumcisision?
-
This is stupid. There are a lot of different things parents do to children that are for their benefit early on in their lives before they know better, such as drug treatments, surgery, and etc. Why should this be outlawed and not the rest? My point is parents do what they think is best, and as long as their is no clear negative outcome of such a procedure (i.e. highly unlikely of something bad happening) than the parents should be able to do so.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Cheese Lady[/quote] Religious discussion's strictly prohibited, ma'am.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] HALO12325 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Cheese Lady Why don't they just ask if he wants some of his foreskin chopped off at his bar mitzvah? Don't act like it's "healthier" to chop your body parts off. If your god gave you that, then that's what you should stick with. Once you start hacking off your god's creation, it really comes off as rude doesn't it. "No God, you did it wrong. This skin needs to come off."[/quote] The reason men are born with this imperfection is because they are punished, I think it was because of the thing with the golden calves at Mount Sinai. The women were against the whole thing so they are born with "perfect" bodies. That's the reasoning behind it. Also, I hope you are joking with the first line with that. [/quote] Pretty stupid...although, I do like that it is depicting women as all around smarter. :D Still, stupid. If your God put it there, then leave it there if you're so devoted to him. To do otherwise seems rather rebellious to the religion, doesn't it? Either way, I wish people would take a step back and ask themselves if this is really necessary. Would you really be worse off with that little bit still on? And if your god is so particular about such things, why worship such a foul creature?
