The new maps suck, and so do the ones they've edited and so do the gametypes.
Armor lock is under-powered, the Magnum is OP, and they've almost ruined Alpha Zombies.
Sword Base is a shell of it's former self, and ALL of the maps they've edited, to be frank, are the -blam!-iest things I've ever played on.
They are either not able, or not willing to make new FREE maps, are killing the maps that exist, and are slowly killing Halo. Their biggest mistake? Listening to you guys.
You don't know anything about game developing, but they chose to listen to you.
Big Mistake.
The game was FINE, until 343. Alpha zombies was the only thing good added to the game, ever.
And everyone online sucks anyways, because everyone that used to post here started playing halo. I play the game for Alpha Zombies and Custom Games.
It's very, very sad that this has happened. Expectations are low for Halo 4.
Anything else you want to bring on the table?
inb410yearoldwantingto1v1me
inb4whatsyourK/D
inb4reachtards
inb4callingmeafloodtard
EDIT
You idiots have been bumping and arguing in this thread for almost six months.
So I'll go ahead and edit the OP with DETAILS
It took me less than five minutes to write the OP
It's been some time since I originally made the OP
And I have come to the following conclusion
The Title update sucks :O
The maps suck
You guys suck
343 sucks
And what's left of the Halo Online community sucks :0
The Title update killed Reach.
[u] WHY I DO NOT LIKE THE TITLE UPDATE [/u]
The hitboxes are stupid
The grenades are mini-nukes
The DMR is basically a slightly-less powerful sniper rifle
Armor lock
The maps suck, even if they're not directly linked to the title update
It is going to remove several playlists I enjoy
(At least I wouldn't have to play those god-awful maps if there was a COMMUNITY playlist)
It HAS removed several playlists I enjoyed
Pistol is OP
Armor lock is HORRIBLY Under-powered
The duration of Armor Camo was reduced
Shield Bleed through (WTF)
Bloom was reduced (DOUBLE WTF. I'm tired of getting spammed by pricks with the DMR)
They Removed Sword block.
melee beatdowns require 3 full blows
Zero Bloom is horrible. It completely throws off the balance of the Halo Reach sandbox. The DMR becomes a full-blown power weapon, and the Needle Rifle is even stronger.
Personally, I still find that 85% bloom causes all the same problems as Zero Bloom
PLEASE don't talk to me about "REAL Halo" (2001 vet reporting in)
Also, if you want to Have Halo Reach be like Combat Evolved or 3..
THEN PLAY MOTHER-blam!- COMBAT EVOLVED OR 3
Because if you -blam!- and moan about Reach, and view Halo 4 as a solution?
Then quite frankly, you are stupid.
[Edited on 08.11.2012 11:29 AM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Scarecrow20009 Kira Wat is that say? [/quote] [url=http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FTFY]FTFY[/url] ... sure he means the first meaning rather than #3. Basically ... everything beats reach. No legendary ending in reach ... for us or bungie. Can't think of a worse way for bungie to leave.
-
Kira Wat is that say?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] shado49 C.E. > 2 > 3 > ODST > 4 >>>> R Hmm..[/quote] FTFY
-
C.E. > 2 > 3 > R > 4 Hmm..
-
Haha, I'm glad, I guess, It's life, we all have to back donw once in a while! And plus it's funny when people delete comments. Kind of. lol.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NobleAni I know what 0/10 means in general, I meant what post ha this person decied is 0/10[/quote] mmmm, yeah ... kinda what I meant by "[i]Now question is ... was the rating meant to be applied to your post (the one preceeding it), or the OPs comment?[/i]". But on the up side ... Wolfie has given you one of his few apologies. Well - to most not an apology - but he changed his insulting post to now read; [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Mythical Wolf .[/quote]
-
I know what 0/10 means in general, I meant what post ha this person decied is 0/10
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NobleAni what is 0/10??? :/[/quote] Cant speak for the person who posted this ... but generally is their rating of your post ... as in nothing out of a possible score of 10. Now question is ... was the rating meant to be applied to your post (the one preceeding it), or the OPs comment?
-
what is 0/10??? :/
-
No different to the OP stating that "343 Ruined Halo Reach" ... it is the application of a single cause to massive effect, when in reality there a many causes. If the OP had listed every cause that brought reach into being, every influence 343's involvement would be but a few small lines [url=http://benhvienmayphatdien.com]May phat dien[/url] ok guy
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NobleAni And what do you mean by 'innocent'?[/quote] Untainted, willing to believe. Some view bungie in the same light as they existed 14 years ago, as an actual bunch of gamers who formed a studio - not what they are, a commercial organisation who need to pay bills and investors (and now live with Activision). So in your '[i]simply making a suggestion[/i]' you had done so in an '[i]innocent[/i]' hope/belief ... but not necessarily with any '[i]idea whether it was actual fact[/i]' (as you put it). Being innocent is not a bad thing. No different to the OP stating that "[i]343 Ruined Halo Reach[/i]" ... it is the application of a single cause to massive effect, when in reality there a many causes. If the OP had listed every cause that brought reach into being, every influence 343's involvement would be but a few small lines. To quote the game "[i]if only it were so simple[/i]".
-
-
And "Oh godlike one", all of that is true, I was kind of summing up my thoughts, and as for the 'they didn't want to be the ones who 'ruined' halo', I had no idea whether it was actual fact or 'a load of crap' (as it was put so kindly above) I was simply making a suggestion . And what do you mean by 'innocent'? Its not an acusation of any kind, I just don't want to try and understand it, but take it the wrong way, or miss read it. :) [Edited on 12.06.2012 11:04 AM PST]
-
Actually 'mythical wolf', it was my opinion, and what I have deducted from my breif foray into the other forums posts, if you didn't like that then I'm sorry, but you can't stop me having an opinion, no matter how 'correct' it is. [Edited on 12.06.2012 11:02 AM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Mythical Wolf You really need to do your research before you post because what you said is a pile of crap. To answer your question, [url=http://bit.ly/SGt9h5][b]here[/b][/url][/quote] Steady on there wolfie, you are never going to get that '[i]forum mod[/i]' assignment you sooooo want by harassing another forum member ... thats a big no-no - lol. Plus what did NobleAni post that wasn't common public knowledge? - '[i]not making Halo wars[/i]', true (to use you own [url=http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100716153148/halo/images/6/66/HaloWarsWithTeen.jpg]standard of proof[/url]) - '[i]I think they paniked a bit[/i]', obvious (again, to your own [url=http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100817185842/halo/images/6/65/Halo_Reach_(Standard_with_ESRB).png]standard of proof[/url]) - '[i]staff were leaving[/i]', again public knowledge. Many reference on the net to bungies struggle with this in the final days ... maybe the most vocal was Peter Tamte (former Bungie VP - kinda think he may know?) Only point I could concede was the "[i]they didn't want to be the ones who 'ruined' Halo[/i]". I also suspect they did want to kill it off - how else can anyone explain bungie producing reach?!? Why would any studio produce a game which will later be a direct competitor to your next title ... but perhaps NobleAni is a little more innocent.
-
Nice very nice.
-
. [Edited on 12.06.2012 11:04 AM PST]
-
I think they paniked a bit, after not making Halo wars, and staff were leaving, they didn't want to be the ones who 'ruined' Halo,knowing how much it meant to the public, they didn't want to make it with less staff and not have it meet the publics expectations, but giving it to 343 was a good choice,better than they originally thoguht, I think! (And by the way, was it 343 or Bungie that did Halo:Combat Evolved Anniversary?)
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NobleAni Fair point, I guess bungie were getting tired of makng Halo, I don't know why though, since it's one of the biggest Xbox franchises, it must have mde loads of money for them[/quote] Why ... greed, ego ... you pick. Like a little kid who does well under a good mentor ... bungie [i]thought[/i] themselves better than Microsoft. Staff were leaving, bungie threw cry moar session - especially when Microsoft started hedging their bets by having Halo Wars made by another studio as a trial. And what have bungie achieved since being granted their freedom in 2007 ... [url=http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77950813]Aerospace[/url] ([i]And ironically, in this failed attempt to play publisher, they made more demands than Microsoft ever did ... even the one game was forced to change its title[/i])
-
yeah!! :D lol jokes
-
People still post in this forum?
-
Fair point, I guess bungie were getting tired of makng Halo, I don't know why though, since it's one of the biggest Xbox franchises, it must have mde loads of money for them, maybe the new ones will fetch even more than the earlier ones like Halo 2 for example, I don't know, It's just an observaton. Either way, I still don't understand why Bungie would give it up!? lol
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NobleAni I wonder what Halo 4 would have been like if 343 hadn't taken over? :)[/quote] It wouldn't have been. bungie didnt even want to do reach, but was forced to under contract. They went the cry moar about how Microsoft was "[i]restricting their creativity[/i]" and causing key staff to leave ([i]funny, many of them went to 343 eventually[/i]). So in short, there wouldnt have been a H4 if it was left to bungie. Still not good that 343 went with the crap reach engine, but thats another story.
-
I somewhat agree. 343i segmented the player base, ruined firefight limited and the TU sucks.
-
Well if 343 wasn't there I don't know what would of happened maybe was getting tired of doing halo games I mean they have started a new project already. Maybe they would of ruined it, I mean some people said that Halo Reach sucked, but I thought it was pretty good.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dancar1 [quote]343 Ruined Halo Reach.[/quote] 343 ruined Halo 4. It was ruined before it was released. [/quote]