Another pointless thread. CoD.Bf3 made the multiplayer boring as hell. Who cares about graphics. Infinity Ward said they are going to listen to their community. Who cares about realism? People who make up excuses on why they hate CoD. They said Bc2 were to be a CoD killer but guess where it ended up.Haters also say CoD is the place where kids go. EVERY DAMN VIDEO GAME HAVE KIDS IN IT SO YOUR ARGUEMENT IS FLAWED! COD IS BETTER.

[quote]Are you guys -blam!- me? First, lets start with BC2 vs MW2. BC2 had: better graphics, better balance, more players per map, larger maps, more teamwork, more mature players (less 9 year olds screaming into the mic), destructible environments, vehicles, etc. I could go on. MW2 on the other hand had more guns. that's it. And COD games are carbon copies of each other every year. BF games always innovate and improve on the last one. Don't believe me? Play 1942, then BF2, then BC1, then BC2. There's a huge gap between all of them. COD is like Madden. They reskin everything and add something completely useless, then market that useless thing like it's a game changing innovation and people start jumping on the bandwagon. So if the current pattern continues (its pretty obvious it will, just look at Frostbite 2) then BF3 will absolutely blow MW3 out of the water.[/quote] damn right.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Qbix89 Because Bad Company 2 was way better than MW2. Modern Warfare are games for children and people who don't know anything about gaming.[/quote] Hahahaha, YES!

Are you guys -blam!- me? First, lets start with BC2 vs MW2. BC2 had: better graphics, better balance, more players per map, larger maps, more teamwork, more mature players (less 9 year olds screaming into the mic), destructible environments, vehicles, etc. I could go on. MW2 on the other hand had more guns. that's it. And COD games are carbon copies of each other every year. BF games always innovate and improve on the last one. Don't believe me? Play 1942, then BF2, then BC1, then BC2. There's a huge gap between all of them. COD is like Madden. They reskin everything and add something completely useless, then market that useless thing like it's a game changing innovation and people start jumping on the bandwagon. So if the current pattern continues (its pretty obvious it will, just look at Frostbite 2) then BF3 will absolutely blow MW3 out of the water.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] killagear10 C'mon convince me why is MW3 better than BF3? [/quote]no

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] bluealpha092 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kesha Population of Cod - 10 million Population of halo - 1 million Population of BF - 100 thousand Yeah I wonder which one is better.[/quote] What? Last time I checked, over 1 million people like BF3's facebook page alone.[/quote]That number will grow.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kesha Population of Cod - 10 million Population of halo - 1 million Population of BF - 100 thousand Yeah I wonder which one is better.[/quote] What? Last time I checked, over 1 million people like BF3's facebook page alone.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Mearle [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Qbix89 Best post of the thread right here. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] GoodApolloIV Anyway, I'm getting sick of these BF3 vs MW3 threads. It's ridiculous that people will go as far to spoil the game just because they prefer one to the other. It's like, saying "Oh you like Coke? Well you're a child who knows nothing about soda. Pepsi is way better".[/quote][/quote] Nice. Master Forum Ninja being a complete hypocrite. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Qbix89 Because Bad Company 2 was way better than MW2. Modern Warfare are games for children and people who don't know anything about gaming.[/quote][/quote] You guys are dumb. He's mocking all of you for your childish fanboyism.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] CHUD CHUFFER1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bryanesie [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote][/quote][/quote]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] hello2k9 Different types of games. People will prefer the more in-depth style of BF3, and others will prefer the hectic gameplay of MW3. I am buying both, so it doesn't matter to me which one is better. [/quote]Since BF3 doesn't have a Release date yet, oh lets just say it comes out a week before the release date of MW3. Do you have enough money to get both of them then?

Because it's opposite day

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bryanesie [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] I1I Stealth I1I [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote] This. MW3 is coming out literally a YEAR after Black Ops came out. It's the same game with a new campaign which will most likely be the same as MW2, with maybe a few tweaks in gameplay, but it'll still be a modfest with campers and some type of prestige lobbies being sent to you every game by 12 year olds who mooch MS points off of other 12 year olds. Infinity Ward knows they can repackage a 'new' game and make millions off of it because people don't know what makes a game good. TIME AND EFFORT. "Don't fix what isn't broken" is a HORRIBLE quote to go by for videogames. CoD has finally gotten boring when Black Ops came out because everyone realized it was like MW2 with worse graphics. ALLLL the while BF3 has an ENTIRE new engine with almost real graphics and destructible environments and has been worked on for a lot longer than one year. The multiplayer for BC 2 and the Vietnam expansion are very fun and addicting, unlike CoD where I'm bored after 4 or so games because of the killstreaks, campers, hackers, and the overpowered perks. I mean just look at the MW3 trailer next to the BF3 gameplay trailer and tell me MW3 will be better. You can't without being retarded. Call me biased or a fanboy, I don't care. I'm sick of Infinity Ward and Activision making carbon copies of a franchise and making money off of pretty much the exact same game every damn year. It's getting old really fast. EDIT: I should also add that CoD has so many players playing because ANYONE CAN PLAY IT. My best friends sister NEVER played a videogame before and after playing MW2 for 2 hours, she was going positive and doing just as good as me and my friend. A 5 year old with Downs Syndrome can play that game. It takes NO SKILL. It's a game of flashlight tag. Soccer moms can play this game. My dad could play this game and he's in his late 50's. Population=/= good game. All it shows is that the game is for casuals.[/quote]Why are you comparing as cinematic trailer to a game play trailer?[/quote] Doesn't matter if it's a cinematic or gameplay trailer. You can see the graphics for both and BF3 is WAY more impressive.[/quote]Actually the Fault Line Trailer is a gameplay trailer, you should watch the first part of it and just the first part when they released it. There's button inputs that come up on screen. Like when you have to drag the fallen Marine to safety. So...if you wanted to you could compare both the gameplay trailer for BF3 with the recently released MW3 trailer and I know BF3 looks far better than MW3 that's something you can't dispute. [/quote]Yea I know. Didn't I say Battlefield has better graphics a few post up.

Because the G36c is back :D

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] I1I Stealth I1I [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote] This. MW3 is coming out literally a YEAR after Black Ops came out. It's the same game with a new campaign which will most likely be the same as MW2, with maybe a few tweaks in gameplay, but it'll still be a modfest with campers and some type of prestige lobbies being sent to you every game by 12 year olds who mooch MS points off of other 12 year olds. Infinity Ward knows they can repackage a 'new' game and make millions off of it because people don't know what makes a game good. TIME AND EFFORT. "Don't fix what isn't broken" is a HORRIBLE quote to go by for videogames. CoD has finally gotten boring when Black Ops came out because everyone realized it was like MW2 with worse graphics. ALLLL the while BF3 has an ENTIRE new engine with almost real graphics and destructible environments and has been worked on for a lot longer than one year. The multiplayer for BC 2 and the Vietnam expansion are very fun and addicting, unlike CoD where I'm bored after 4 or so games because of the killstreaks, campers, hackers, and the overpowered perks. I mean just look at the MW3 trailer next to the BF3 gameplay trailer and tell me MW3 will be better. You can't without being retarded. Call me biased or a fanboy, I don't care. I'm sick of Infinity Ward and Activision making carbon copies of a franchise and making money off of pretty much the exact same game every damn year. It's getting old really fast. EDIT: I should also add that CoD has so many players playing because ANYONE CAN PLAY IT. My best friends sister NEVER played a videogame before and after playing MW2 for 2 hours, she was going positive and doing just as good as me and my friend. A 5 year old with Downs Syndrome can play that game. It takes NO SKILL. It's a game of flashlight tag. Soccer moms can play this game. My dad could play this game and he's in his late 50's. Population=/= good game. All it shows is that the game is for casuals.[/quote]Why are you comparing as cinematic trailer to a game play trailer?[/quote] Doesn't matter if it's a cinematic or gameplay trailer. You can see the graphics for both and BF3 is WAY more impressive.[/quote]Actually the Fault Line Trailer is a gameplay trailer, you should watch the first part of it and just the first part when they released it. There's button inputs that come up on screen. Like when you have to drag the fallen Marine to safety. So...if you wanted to you could compare both the gameplay trailer for BF3 with the recently released MW3 trailer and I know BF3 looks far better than MW3 that's something you can't dispute.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kesha [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bryanesie [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kesha Population of Cod - 10 million Population of halo - 1 million Population of BF - 100 thousand Yeah I wonder which one is better.[/quote]CoD is such a generic game to play and that's why there's a generic group of "gamers" who constantly play it. I think they fail to realize that it's the [b]same[/b] game they keep paying for. [/quote] Why switch to a game that keeps getting worse like BF and halo. [/quote]BF3 just blew expectations out of the water with their new engine I guess that's getting worse to you? I had no idea that implementing a new and refreshing element to a game that made it stand out and look amazing made it worse. Gosh...what's CoD done lately then?

@ L0llz [quote] Because it has better destruction graphics and animations!! [/quote]MW3 does not have better destruction fool!

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EnragedElite67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VVo1fy [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote] This. MW3 is coming out literally a YEAR after Black Ops came out. It's the same game with a new campaign which will most likely be the same as MW2, with maybe a few tweaks in gameplay, but it'll still be a modfest with campers and some type of prestige lobbies being sent to you every game by 12 year olds who mooch MS points off of other 12 year olds. Infinity Ward knows they can repackage a 'new' game and make millions off of it because people don't know what makes a game good. TIME AND EFFORT. "Don't fix what isn't broken" is a HORRIBLE quote to go by for videogames. CoD has finally gotten boring when Black Ops came out because everyone realized it was like MW2 with worse graphics. ALLLL the while BF3 has an ENTIRE new engine with almost real graphics and destructible environments and has been worked on for a lot longer than one year. The multiplayer for BC 2 and the Vietnam expansion are very fun and addicting, unlike CoD where I'm bored after 4 or so games because of the killstreaks, campers, hackers, and the overpowered perks. I mean just look at the MW3 trailer next to the BF3 gameplay trailer and tell me MW3 will be better. You can't without being retarded. Call me biased or a fanboy, I don't care. I'm sick of Infinity Ward and Activision making carbon copies of a franchise and making money off of pretty much the exact same game every damn year. It's getting old really fast.[/quote] I TL;DR after the first sentence..... 3arc made Black Ops last year NOT IW, MW2 came out in 2009 MW3 will come out 1 month before 2012....Besides IW is getting help from two other studios..get your facts right kid.[/quote]Hey kid, don't be a -blam!-tard even COD fanboys know that 3arch copy and paste IW game and manages to make it even worse horrible hit detection, major host dependency, -blam!-ier graphics, and over all worse multiplayer. COD gets "developed" and rushed out in almost the same amount of time that a woman gets pregnant and has a baby. [/quote] I can assure you that I am not a kid, anyway did I ever said Black ops was a good game? No, why are you complaining about that in the first place? [/quote]I just called you a kid since you threw that out. But you are trying to defend COD saying they aren't as rushed as we think they are. When they are rushed out as fast as possible, and they are rushed out as a horrible game. so a whole whopping 2 years from MW2 to MW3 and I'm pretty sure we all know they haven't been working on MW3 for the whole 2 years probably a little over a year. [/quote] But at the end of the day this is what people want, the COD feeling, that's the winning formula for these games..Change is not always a good thing just look at all the complaining Reach gets in the Reach Forums..and Graphics? Have you ever wondered why BF, Killzone, and Crysis 2 got that heavy feeling to it that's because they run at 30 frames or under per second, COD has that fast paced gameplay that looks NICE and that people love...yes MW2 had overpowered guns and hackers but that doesn't mean MW3 will have them. Anyway I think we should wait for MP gameplay. EDIT: I only like Black Ops' Campaign and Zombie Mode so let's stop talking about it please, this about MW3/BF. [Edited on 05.29.2011 11:41 AM PDT]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ALI217 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] theslatcher I can't.[/quote][/quote]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VVo1fy [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EnragedElite67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VVo1fy [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote] This. MW3 is coming out literally a YEAR after Black Ops came out. It's the same game with a new campaign which will most likely be the same as MW2, with maybe a few tweaks in gameplay, but it'll still be a modfest with campers and some type of prestige lobbies being sent to you every game by 12 year olds who mooch MS points off of other 12 year olds. Infinity Ward knows they can repackage a 'new' game and make millions off of it because people don't know what makes a game good. TIME AND EFFORT. "Don't fix what isn't broken" is a HORRIBLE quote to go by for videogames. CoD has finally gotten boring when Black Ops came out because everyone realized it was like MW2 with worse graphics. ALLLL the while BF3 has an ENTIRE new engine with almost real graphics and destructible environments and has been worked on for a lot longer than one year. The multiplayer for BC 2 and the Vietnam expansion are very fun and addicting, unlike CoD where I'm bored after 4 or so games because of the killstreaks, campers, hackers, and the overpowered perks. I mean just look at the MW3 trailer next to the BF3 gameplay trailer and tell me MW3 will be better. You can't without being retarded. Call me biased or a fanboy, I don't care. I'm sick of Infinity Ward and Activision making carbon copies of a franchise and making money off of pretty much the exact same game every damn year. It's getting old really fast.[/quote] I TL;DR after the first sentence..... 3arc made Black Ops last year NOT IW, MW2 came out in 2009 MW3 will come out 1 month before 2012....Besides IW is getting help from two other studios..get your facts right kid.[/quote]Hey kid, don't be a -blam!-tard even COD fanboys know that 3arch copy and paste IW game and manages to make it even worse horrible hit detection, major host dependency, -blam!-ier graphics, and over all worse multiplayer. COD gets "developed" and rushed out in almost the same amount of time that a woman gets pregnant and has a baby. [/quote] I can assure you that I am not a kid, anyway did I ever said Black ops was a good game? No, why are you complaining about that in the first place? [/quote]I just called you a kid since you threw that out. But you are trying to defend COD saying they aren't as rushed as we think they are. When they are rushed out as fast as possible, and they are rushed out as a horrible game. so a whole whopping 2 years from MW2 to MW3 and I'm pretty sure we all know they haven't been working on MW3 for the whole 2 years probably a little over a year. I put the BO thing in because you had to mention that 3arch made BO not IW when in reality they copy and pasted it and made it worse. So that game was even more rushed than the others. [Edited on 05.29.2011 11:35 AM PDT]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EnragedElite67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VVo1fy [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote] This. MW3 is coming out literally a YEAR after Black Ops came out. It's the same game with a new campaign which will most likely be the same as MW2, with maybe a few tweaks in gameplay, but it'll still be a modfest with campers and some type of prestige lobbies being sent to you every game by 12 year olds who mooch MS points off of other 12 year olds. Infinity Ward knows they can repackage a 'new' game and make millions off of it because people don't know what makes a game good. TIME AND EFFORT. "Don't fix what isn't broken" is a HORRIBLE quote to go by for videogames. CoD has finally gotten boring when Black Ops came out because everyone realized it was like MW2 with worse graphics. ALLLL the while BF3 has an ENTIRE new engine with almost real graphics and destructible environments and has been worked on for a lot longer than one year. The multiplayer for BC 2 and the Vietnam expansion are very fun and addicting, unlike CoD where I'm bored after 4 or so games because of the killstreaks, campers, hackers, and the overpowered perks. I mean just look at the MW3 trailer next to the BF3 gameplay trailer and tell me MW3 will be better. You can't without being retarded. Call me biased or a fanboy, I don't care. I'm sick of Infinity Ward and Activision making carbon copies of a franchise and making money off of pretty much the exact same game every damn year. It's getting old really fast.[/quote] I TL;DR after the first sentence..... 3arc made Black Ops last year NOT IW, MW2 came out in 2009 MW3 will come out 1 month before 2012....Besides IW is getting help from two other studios..get your facts right kid.[/quote]Hey kid, don't be a -blam!-tard even COD fanboys know that 3arch copy and paste IW game and manages to make it even worse horrible hit detection, major host dependency, -blam!-ier graphics, and over all worse multiplayer. COD gets "developed" and rushed out in almost the same amount of time that a woman gets pregnant and has a baby. [/quote] I can assure you that I am not a kid, anyway did I ever said Black ops was a good game? No, why are you complaining about that in the first place? [Edited on 05.29.2011 11:29 AM PDT]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] I1I Stealth I1I [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pro Darko It's not...[/quote] This. MW3 is coming out literally a YEAR after Black Ops came out. It's the same game with a new campaign which will most likely be the same as MW2, with maybe a few tweaks in gameplay, but it'll still be a modfest with campers and some type of prestige lobbies being sent to you every game by 12 year olds who mooch MS points off of other 12 year olds. Infinity Ward knows they can repackage a 'new' game and make millions off of it because people don't know what makes a game good. TIME AND EFFORT. "Don't fix what isn't broken" is a HORRIBLE quote to go by for videogames. CoD has finally gotten boring when Black Ops came out because everyone realized it was like MW2 with worse graphics. ALLLL the while BF3 has an ENTIRE new engine with almost real graphics and destructible environments and has been worked on for a lot longer than one year. The multiplayer for BC 2 and the Vietnam expansion are very fun and addicting, unlike CoD where I'm bored after 4 or so games because of the killstreaks, campers, hackers, and the overpowered perks. I mean just look at the MW3 trailer next to the BF3 gameplay trailer and tell me MW3 will be better. You can't without being retarded. Call me biased or a fanboy, I don't care. I'm sick of Infinity Ward and Activision making carbon copies of a franchise and making money off of pretty much the exact same game every damn year. It's getting old really fast. EDIT: I should also add that CoD has so many players playing because ANYONE CAN PLAY IT. My best friends sister NEVER played a videogame before and after playing MW2 for 2 hours, she was going positive and doing just as good as me and my friend. A 5 year old with Downs Syndrome can play that game. It takes NO SKILL. It's a game of flashlight tag. Soccer moms can play this game. My dad could play this game and he's in his late 50's. Population=/= good game. All it shows is that the game is for casuals.[/quote]Why are you comparing as cinematic trailer to a game play trailer?[/quote] Doesn't matter if it's a cinematic or gameplay trailer. You can see the graphics for both and BF3 is WAY more impressive.[/quote]We all know that call of duty isn't going to beat BF3 in graphics. COD was never known for graphics anyway. We have not seen any game play of MW3 yet. It's not entirely fair. [Edited on 05.29.2011 11:30 AM PDT]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] aaz b [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Piggyback [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BananaHalla That's Good. Less Cod F@gs in our battlefield[/quote]

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EnragedElite67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kelly Clarkson [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EnragedElite67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kelly Clarkson Call of duty is the future of gaming, stop hating on it.[/quote]If by "gaming" you mean casuals and 5 year olds who like -blam!-ier and -blam!-ier quality games that are super easy and noob friendly than yes. If you meant gaming as high quality innovative games than no you are wrong. This cancerous growth called Call of Duty needs to be removed.[/quote] Only if Halo and BF are removed first.[/quote]I am fine removing Reach, but CE 2 and 3 all brought something to the plate, and Bad Company can go since it is terrible compared to actual Battlefield games.[/quote] Fine WaW can go.

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Extroverted How? We haven't played either game. But from what they have shown us, Battlefail 3 looks more impressive than Modded Whorefail 3[/quote] Troll harder

[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kelly Clarkson [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EnragedElite67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Kelly Clarkson Call of duty is the future of gaming, stop hating on it.[/quote]If by "gaming" you mean casuals and 5 year olds who like -blam!-ier and -blam!-ier quality games that are super easy and noob friendly than yes. If you meant gaming as high quality innovative games than no you are wrong. This cancerous growth called Call of Duty needs to be removed.[/quote] Only if Halo and BF are removed first.[/quote]I am fine removing Reach, but CE 2 and 3 all brought something to the plate, and Bad Company can go since it is terrible compared to actual Battlefield games. Then we remove all CODs that came after the original Modern Warfare, sound good? We effectively would get rid of all the terrible shooters that are copy and pasted with nothing redeeming about them. [Edited on 05.29.2011 11:27 AM PDT]