{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/3/2024 4:55:22 PM
2
Pathfinder should be split into the 3 different modes, yay or nay?
So the pale heart has its own pathfinder for things you can only do in the pale heart, makes sense. So why can't they make 3 different pathfinders for vanguard, crucible and gambit activities? For the players who only touch PvE and don't touch PvP or vice versa
An argument could be made that if you play all 3, that you'd get insane loot and XP which is fair, but is it anymore unfair than limiting players who get a PvP pathfinder tree when they don't play PvP?
English
#destiny2
-
1 ReplyEdited by EMUracing: 7/3/2024 5:02:09 PMYou know that if they split it into 3 different pathfinders (one for each ritual activity section), that they will have one pinnacle per pathway. Meaning that if you want all 3 pinnacles, you now have to grind all 3 activities instead of dipping a toe into an activity you dont like every once in a while for the easiest path completion. This is Bungie, they dont give anything without taking more than they give! I think that they should slightly adjust the nodes in the current system. To offer a little more freedom and remove the near impossible nodes (or broken ones).
-
Guardian,Archon Of LightRIP Destiny 9-14-2014 to 2-18-2026 - old
Yes, each mode needs its own separate pathfinder
