crucible feels awful to play because you almost always have to sit in a match that was decided in the first sixty seconds. i absolutely detest playing crucible, stop making me play supremacy every year.
gambit is the superior pvp activity because in theory you never know who is going to win and the matches are WAY more frequently a close call until the end. i have legit been in matches where my team was down 15 motes to primeval summoned and my team, me and three blueberries, pulled out a win. i've been on the opposite side, where me and three friends should have won but the other team was more on the ball and good for them. in crucible there is no come-from-behind victory, there is no underdog wins the day story, and it sucks and it's the worst to have to endure seven minutes of something that is already over.
please put some -blam!- effort into gambit, you absolute lunatics, because i would like to be excited about pvp and the proposed changes to crucible, while definitely a valiant effort and on paper sounded great, don't change the fact that it's still crucible and it's everything i hate about pvp gaming and crucible still feels awful to play.
-
Gambit matches [i]seem[/i] close because of the rampant catch-up mechanics. The game is much easier for the team that’s losing. They can’t really do that in PvP. Crucible is frustrating for average players, like me. But I’d never want to play a match where I got more armor or the other team did less damage when my team is losing.