Title says it all, makes no sense to still be kinetic
English
#destiny2
-
Actually it does make sense, as it has always been kinetic. You need a reason for it to switch. Therefore it makes sense to remain kinetic and makes no sense to become Stasis.
-
[quote]Title says it all, makes no sense to still be kinetic[/quote] No Time to Explain was originally a D1 weapon, way before Stasis was even created.
-
Then why wasn’t No Time To Explain Stasis when it was originally released in D1? Honestly what makes the most sense is for it to be kinetic, but to have some sort of synergy with Stasis, given it’s relevancy to the element. [spoiler]Oh wait[/spoiler][spoiler]That’s exactly what they did[/spoiler]
-
5 RepliesWould that change anything though? Honestly does staisis as a weapon element even do anything?
-
7 Replies[quote]Title says it all, makes no sense to still be kinetic[/quote] WHY... Its kinetic and not even related to stasis, I swear you are the same person who wants coldheart to be stasis
-
Edited by Fleecy-Sentry: 9/14/2021 8:02:47 AMIf it didn’t originate from D1, i’d “somewhat” agree. the only time the weapon differed from kinetic was becoming arc within the D1 primary slot(for a short time in the grand scheme). The strangers rifle/NTTE would not really work as a stasis weapon, considering it does have some vex parts within it.
-
You kids again?
-
Edited by I hate manky even more: 9/13/2021 10:38:52 PMWhat is the logic of this other yhan you want it to be? Also heres a lore explanation. The weapon draws bullets from other timelines to be used in its portal. Our time line was the only one that learned to control stasis, meaning that stasis weapons do not exist in other timelines.
-
No time to explain is a time travelly gun. Not a darkness one.
-
And it’s “stasis buddy” should be a freeze turret not an arc soul🧐
-
Maybe the portal is stasis?
-
...Alright...you get this one...
-
You know, you're not wrong