So, me and my friends (who have never been flawless) go into trials and on our first match we get matched against three flawless players, thus getting curbstomped. Then I thought, why dont they also base trials matchmaking on whether you have been flawless or not. For example, if no one on your team has been flawless, you will match against players who have also never been flawless. Basically, both teams will have the same amount of flawless players. Of course, this would never get implemented and even if it did, all the pvp streamers would throw a temper tantrum like they did when sbmm was implemented. They would be salty that they got matched with people of a similar skill and not against people they could steamroll.
-
1 ReplyEdited by BRAZACK: 8/4/2020 1:47:01 PMLol i hardly ever go in there i can do just fine in comp but in trials i always get -blam!-. I went in there yesterday for the auto because of the bounty. I knew we wouldnt win so if we kept losing we would eventually get progress and compete it. We played like 7 games or so and only won 1. Ofc i was with two lfg randoms but damn you are right....the scales aint balanced at all. There is a whole different breed in trials, they use the meta/only the best stuff with the highest ttk. Super sweaty cheesy meta users. I got my auto with rangefinder, zen moment , mag perks in colum 3 and a handling masterwork. It was pretty solid pre masterwork but as soon as i master worked it, it now feels weird. When the sniper comes around i might go back in. I have been avoiding trials like the plague but although we got steamrolled it was kinda fun. So i might start doing it every week now....for the bounty anyway.
-
2 RepliesYou may not agree with it, but its not really broken. It's working as intended. You're kd is 0.9 in casual playlists, meaning you die more than you kill. Then you go into a hardcore mode and expect to excel? Do you practice in elimination? Do you want PvP tips?