Does Bungie just do in house testing of new DLC content or do they seek outside players for honest opinions? Just curious how the leads on the game can get things so wrong sometimes when they say we are listening. It seems that some real players honest play opinions could save the game a lot of troublesome work. Edit> What I am asking is does Bungie have outside people come in and play a piece of programming, not to see if it works correctly or has bugs but to see if its something the community will enjoy as a whole. Or do they just do testing internally with staff who worked on projects. For example. COS was possibly the worst DLC in the entirety of the Destiny franchise. The loot system was all messed up, the story was childish and so easy a 5 year old could play it, the planet mercury was a big desert of nothing, and it had lots of not very well thought out but very interesting gameplay. Before the launch, Destiny devs and employees were super excited to show what they had made in house for the community. But if they had play tested the DLC with real players, they would have known long before hand that it was a big dud. With a DLC like Forsaken, they had the expertise of Vicarious visions to work on it and also seem to have a much better understanding of what players really want. But Vicarious would have people from the outside play and critic things they work on. Bungie on the other hand doesn't seem to do that with its in house content.