[quote]Read what I just explained again. You must've not understood it. Perhaps you just don't understand English. (nor game design?).[/quote] I understand both fine, but I don’t accept BS other people make up.

Incorrect. You did not understand what I explained. Please read it again. If you're going to continue purposefully arguing against facts and logic I'm going to have to mute you.

[quote]Incorrect. You did not understand what I explained. Please read it again. If you're going to continue purposefully arguing against facts and logic I'm going to have to mute you.[/quote] I understand what you’re saying, but that doesn’t make any of it true. That’s the point. Mute away. You’re going to have to start providing logic and facts in place of your bias if you want me to agree with what you’re saying. Find any proof yet? No? Didn’t think so.

Proof has already been explained and inference and deduction used to analyse actions taken by Bungie in reference to the reckoning t3 activity as I have already pointed out. It is quite a simple concept and yet I explained it in detail to you but you cannot grasp it unfortunately. That is on you. You're beginning to sound like a troll, your agenda is showing.

[quote]Proof has already been explained and inference and deduction used to analyse actions taken by Bungie in reference to the reckoning t3 activity as I have already pointed out. It is quite a simple concept and yet I explained it in detail to you but you cannot grasp it unfortunately. That is on you. You're beginning to sound like a troll, your agenda is showing.[/quote] Your biased opinion isn’t proof. Proof would be a link to an actual case study you claim exists. Proof would even be Bungie officially commenting that is the case and they have the data to back it up but don’t want to share it publicly. In your case you’re jumping to a conclusion that supports your biased narrative without any actual proof. Inference isn’t proof. Deduction also isn’t proof. What do you think my “agenda” is?

You're just so wrong my friend. A case study is exactly that. A study of a case. We do not need to know the statistics Bungie internally measured because it doesn't matter. The evidence is that they caved in to demands of tons of forum complaints, reddit threads and so on and as a direct result made the activity easier. Also, you keep mentioning how I say that "Bungie admitted optional Matchmaking was a failure" but I never once said that. Not once. That is a conclusion that you draw using your brain once you analyse the evidence and actions. I have explained this in detail already above. The fact that the activity had to be made easier to accomade users who use Matchmaking but fail to complete the activity, subsequently causing many complaints is exactly why Matchmaking failed. Not because Bungie said so, that is simply the conclusion you can draw. Also for the love of God can you please stop using anecdotal evidence as an argument. It is not one. Your personal experience means literally nothing. No one cares if you personally had a good time with reckoning Matchmaking and was able to complete your reckoner title. It is it relavent. It does not matter. You do not represent the community. Tha ti's the foundation on which studies are made. You do not support claims with personal stories. You use evidence or examples found within the wider spectrum. Hence why I keep referring to the literal hundreds of posts and complaints and videos and so on asking for Reckoning to be changed. That is the community at large. Again we will never know the exact number Bungie measured, but that does not matter because we have their direct response to these complaints. Regardless of the numbers, they must've been bad enough to cave in to the demands and therefore everything in my previous posts stands true.

[quote]You're just so wrong my friend. A case study is exactly that. A study of a case. We do not need to know the statistics Bungie internally measured because it doesn't matter. The evidence is that they caved in to demands of tons of forum complaints, reddit threads and so on and as a direct result made the activity easier. Also, you keep mentioning how I say that "Bungie admitted optional Matchmaking was a failure" but I never once said that. Not once. That is a conclusion that you draw using your brain once you analyse the evidence and actions. I have explained this in detail already above. The fact that the activity had to be made easier to accomade users who use Matchmaking but fail to complete the activity, subsequently causing many complaints is exactly why Matchmaking failed. Not because Bungie said so, that is simply the conclusion you can draw. Also for the love of God can you please stop using anecdotal evidence as an argument. It is not one. Your personal experience means literally nothing. No one cares if you personally had a good time with reckoning Matchmaking and was able to complete your reckoner title. It is it relavent. It does not matter. You do not represent the community. Tha ti's the foundation on which studies are made. You do not support claims with personal stories. You use evidence or examples found within the wider spectrum. Hence why I keep referring to the literal hundreds of posts and complaints and videos and so on asking for Reckoning to be changed. That is the community at large. Again we will never know the exact number Bungie measured, but that does not matter because we have their direct response to these complaints. Regardless of the numbers, they must've been bad enough to cave in to the demands and therefore everything in my previous posts stands true.[/quote] You’re jumping to a conclusion to support your biased narrative. That’s isn’t proof. If you want to prove it, show proof. If you can’t show proof then just admit you want others to take your word for it since you can’t actually prove it. I’m not going to take your word for it, because I know for a fact optional matchmaking works just fine for me. Offer an actual case study or proof an actual case study exists, and not just you drawing a conclusion based on your speculation. Then you can start talking about case studies.

Simply incorrect. You sound like a troll now. Apparently no matter how detailed and explanation and how simple the concept is, some people just dont get it. Enjoy living in ignorance.

[quote]Simply incorrect. You sound like a troll now. Apparently no matter how detailed and explanation and how simple the concept is, some people just dont get it. Enjoy living in ignorance.[/quote] I understand what your BS theory you’re trying to pass off as proof is, but it’s just your personal theory. There is no proof. If there was you could show proof. If I am so ignorant please enlighten me with facts.

No theory. Just facts, logic, infference and deduction. Things the human brain uses to analyse things that happen in our world. Its been detailed and explained, you simply lack the comprehension to understand what really is quite a simple concept. Good day. troll.