Within the first three months, the legal range for the procedure, fetuses are biologically incapable of either thought or pain. And by the time an individual grows enough to be capable of contemplating this, any healthy individual is biologically wired to resist death in any capacity, all after the damage and consequences of a child have all been cemented. I know this is a troll post, but I despise fallacies. What makes us human is our ability to think and reason, something that correlates with the medical declaration of death being brain death, or no noticeable conscious or unconscious activity within the brain. Once that goes, we are in the eyes of law dead, thus being subject to the decision by family to be severed from life support. If a family member can decide that their comatose significant other isn't worth keeping alive by external means, even if there could be a chance of improvement, a parent has every right to decide the same with a mass of cells literally incapable of thought and reason within the legal range for abortion. Especially with the state of the world and increasing overpopulation and housing shortages, people have no place to decide what other people do with their own bodies. That's like saying males shouldn't be allowed to masturbate because they're sacrificing material that could become a person. The whole concept of "pro-choice" is stating the choice of the parent in deciding, not the opinions of others. In that equation, in the first three months, a fetus is not an interested party, it's basically just an organ, incapable of supporting itself.