{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/21/2018 9:40:04 AM
19
This is why people shouldn’t have guns, they get mad and then use them. This time was yet another kid killed.
[spoiler]Nothing to do with the gun tho I’m sure he would of stabbed or strangled or run over the child instead if he didn’t have a gun [/spoiler]
[spoiler]not[/spoiler]
English
-
And I'm sure banning guns will solve every problem there is
-
Of course, it will cure cancer, solve world hunger and bring peace globally. [spoiler]or at least that mother would still have a living son ☹️ [/spoiler]
-
Because the same effect wouldn’t have happened if the man pulled out a machete. Riiiight.
-
a mother could of got in the way of that. Not a bullet.
-
Stabby stab mom, then walk over and stabby stab kids. This isn’t rocket science.
-
He could smother all three with a pencil case too, guns just so much easier to kill with a momentary lapse of judgement, or even accidentally if he pointed it at them. That's the difference people like you blatantly ignore.
-
Yeah but because the kid was shot doesn't mean that the guns are the problem but more the person who shot the kid
-
Problem is that person had a gun. Some people just not fit for it. He was one, clearly.
-
I'm not saying that everyone should have a gun. But this sounds like that this tragedy is a product of road rage and then shooting meaning that the person, not guns are at fault
-
The persons only at fault due to his ability to do what he did. Because he had the gun. To say the guns not at fault is wrong, you need a gun and a person to do what happened here. Removing one stops it. And we can’t ban people, (unfortunately)
-
Agreed on your last point. But he could have just stabbed the kid or done numerous other things than just shooting him
-
Unlikely, imagine the situation, he’s out his car being angry at the mother who was driving, I’m guessing the kid was in the passenger seat, he gets very mad and points his gun and shoots.. If he had a knife he wouldn’t reach the passenger side, he was probably aiming for the mother not a kid. The mother might of suffered fatal wounds, maybe not. I think the kid would of had a lot better chances of surviving or not being hurt tho. I’m sure we both agree that man was not capable of owning a gun, even if it was his right to do so. Even a good person can lose their shit once in a while.
-
I agree with your last point and while I don't advocate for complete gun control I do advocate for more detailed background checks on people buying weapons
-
The problem is not that the person had the gun. It’s what they [i]didn’t[/i] have. Self-control. That guy is one of the people who shouldn’t have them.
-
Exactly, and we can only know that after he shot the kid. Best way don't allow guns to be carried like that, it wasn't even in his home
-
Have a psychiatric test to see whether they are right enough in their mind to handle a gun.
-
That would stop a few but wouldn’t be perfect, be easy to research how to answer such a test. Also people can just lose their shit, who knows that bloke might of found out his misses was cheating on him and the road rage pushed him over the edge.
-
We got ourselves a liberal poster i see. Tsk Tsk
-
