{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/20/2017 6:58:29 PM
1
Good to know, but my point still stands, KD does not make your opinion more valid
If only the high KD players opinions were used, then Crucible would end up only having those players, as the rest of the playerbase would just get sick of being annihilated by camping noobs who are glued together
Current Crucible is a battle of who can camp and teamshot the hardest, which is the least skilled way to play this game
English
-
Crucible should be balanced around the best players. A bad player will be bad with any gun, so their opinions on balance will be useless. They will whine that everything is broken because they just suck, and won't admit it. That's why they complained about something like shotguns in destiny 1. Skilled players are not the camping noobs, however. The problem with D2 and Y3 D1 is that there is no skill gap. Year 1 and 2 D1 did have a skill gap
-
Crucible should be balanced according to the majority, not the minority, as the majority are, well, the majority of the playerbase
-
The majority of the playerbade sucks no matter the meta meta, so why?
-
It doesn't matter if they suck, they're still the majority
-
but once again, you do not balance a game around crappy players who will be bad in every meta. Are the rules of sports leagues designed around the kindergarten leagues?
-
Of course the rules of sports leagues aren't built around kindergarten students, but Destiny isn't a sport, or a competition, [b]it's a video game[/b] Drop the elitist attitude and realize that it doesn't matter if you're good, it's a game
