{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/30/2017 10:11:28 PM
1
Not true. There are plenty of changes that don't require DLC. All of the vendor changes, all of the material/token changes.
I don't think it classifies as criminal either. Maybe sketchy or immoral. I already bought all the DLC, and would get it anyway, as it looks decent.
I think payed DLC is general sucks though. But even if they didn't charge for the DLC, there's no way to be sure it wasn't cut content or something like that all the same.
End the end, its a game, and it shouldn't be a huge issue. There are instances where people should explain messed up situations, like Battlefront, so that people know what they are getting into, but this game isn't anything to get bent out of shape over. There are plenty of things more worth getting angry about, beside some game.
English
-
Think about what the update aims to fix: rewards with limited events like Iron Banner, Faction Rallies, Nightfalls, Trials of Osiris. To make end game content more rewarding. In the past, everything but low level strikes, prior crucible play lists, and the previous raid were playable by non-DLC holders. This means that the major selling point for the December Update will be for content they no longer have access to. I want Bungie to address what happens with Trials, Iron Banner, the up and coming heroic strikes and Nightfalls. That if this content is made to be fixed, will those that do not hold the DLC still have access to them?
