Marks and cloaks add so much more fashion diversity to titans and hunters. Bonds are pretty much all the same and aren't even noticeable.
-
11 RepliesGender wise all Titan armour is designed to be masculine looking without thought for gender. If you chose a female char then you are stuck with looking like a bloke. This was the same in d1 I thought it might have changed in d2 and armour would encompass gender. But sadly not. I choose female chars I like the idea of a strong female lead char or heroine, but all the armour in d2 makes my char look like a bloke. I’m d1 the only armour I found that suited my Titan was the Queens Guard Armour. Maybe it’s something the design team can look at going forward when other issues are ironed out. Making armour suit gender would be good idea.
-
1 ReplyThey get a dress already. Need some heels and a purse too.??
-
2 RepliesI think they need a whole arm gauntlet. Only on one arm of course. Can show more detail, single shoulder armor, and a special glove for all the times I go to by falecia something and they fly away
-
Would like to see warlocks with anything else but robes, hunters without a hood and titans with a christmas scarf.
-
1 ReplyI wish titans had cloaks!!! I wish all 3 classes would be able to choose what they wanted
-
I agree. Some kind of cool utility belt would be neat. Maybe one with dildos on it.
-
Maybe one on each arm?
-
[quote]Marks and cloaks add so much more fashion diversity to titans and hunters. Bonds are pretty much all the same and aren't even noticeable.[/quote] Indeed
-
Im liking the idea of a full arm kind of deal. A space sleeve/tattoo looking thing. The bonds in d2 are just awful looking.
-
I like bonds - less goofy that a "butt cape" titan mark or a bedsheet kid's blanket wrapped around a hunter's shoulders.
-
Idk that IB one was pretty sick.
-
I'm fine with it being a bond. The class items just aren't very good in D2. The selection of cloaks is awful. The bonds just need to be cooler. Remember the ornamented ones from AoT? Those were awesome.
-
The class items are pretty hideous for the most part, so I'm glad they aren't as noticeable.
-
I agree, in destiny 1 when I made my first warlock I was highly confused and disappointed by them
-
The bond with the gold dragons on it is the only visually stunning one. The rest are shit that I just infuse or dismantle. Bonds in D1 were sometimes exciting like the iron banner ones with ornaments.
-
1 ReplyEdited by ImBatMan: 11/1/2017 5:28:33 PMWarlocks suck. Let the salt begin.
-
The FWC one.... lol what a joke. I had the Planet One already, and I colored it blue... Then I got the FWC one and was like.... ah, um.. Love the effort Bungie.
-
How about a poncho? Get them from Hawthorne, since she doesn't like capes.
-
Warlock are so.much better in d2. (My opinion) but your right they get this arm band that looks cool as hell when look at it up close but you can't see it other wise. I can never tell what someone is wearing unless i inspect them.
-
4 Repliesthey already do .... [spoiler]it's called a skirt.[/spoiler]
-
what! you can see the fartlock bond from across the map! [spoiler]sarcasm[/spoiler]
-
Ok what would you suggest? Ankle bracelet? No I know, a choker!!! Let's not worry about class items and instead have bungie fix the armor so it stays on the warlock. There's been some pretty elaborate bonds in the past. I'm sure we will get some going forward.
-
2 RepliesThis should be in feedback section under the “things Bungie won’t listen too” sub section. Which is basically what all the feedback sections are nowadays...
-
I've been thinking this for along time and I don't even really use worlocks. I like the idea of the bonds but it should take a larger portion of the arm, if not the whole arm
-
Agreed.. Bonds are just so small it doesn't really matter. And not going to lie. I don't know if I ever even see or know what any other Warlock has on.. But I always see titan and hunter things..
-
Some kind of shoulder plate would be really cool.