Who cares game is garbage. Call of duty wwll

Hopefully not because Destiny 1 was a disaster on launch. You paid for a tenth of a game. I quit after year 1 because it sucked so bad. Yeah, sure, I hear it was better later...you know, after you paid your ransom money for them to give you the game they should have at launch and paid twice as much, or you didn't get to play the game that you purchased nearly at all. If you like paying hostage money and being blackmailed for an eventually, and very arguably, good video game, congrats! You can still go play that game. But Destiny 2 was a full game on launch. Sorry if you don't like it. Sorry if you blew through the content that was clearly there and are searching for things to do (I'm not). But if that's the case, maybe then it's not Bungie that's the problem? Not saying to like something you don't. Not saying don't complain. But I can't help but think this is down to personal preferences, and people not liking that D2 doesn't look like d1, even when d2 is absolutely fine.

The issues for me are the slow cooldowns(why you take away my space magic?), my characters don't feel powerful anymore, the 2 primary weapon system isn't fun and lacks DPS(special weapons need to come back), snipers are useless and weak in PvE, the basic skill trees that can't be mixed together, terrible exotics, no machine guns, no tracking on launchers, except one, one rocket magazines, no Cryptic Dragonesque legendary scouts, weak grenades, weak supers, enemies that constantly teleport, single use shaders, single use mods, the mod system in general is terrible, no INT/DIS/STR, Mobility/Armor/Recovery adjustments belong in the skill tree, no useful perks on armor, raid gear sucks, no random rolls, most weapons are boring and get sharded, no heroic strikes/story, infusion is class and weapon type locked, engrams can't be transferred between characters, the slot machine loot system, no bounties to earn Vanguard and faction rep, no strike specific loot, 4v4 team shooting PvP, timed nightfalls, no actual quest screen, and an overall lack of variety, player choice, fast-paced action, and fun. The game lacks most of the improvements from D1 too. I love Destiny, but I can't stand playing D2 anymore. It's so stale and boring.

Nope the cabal took over Bungie headquarters. When I asked them why they made themself lose in the game? they said".....no you are the one who bought the game...how did we lose?"

I just liked it to 343 likes. You're welcome.

It’s the same company, yeah, but not the same development team. After Joe Staten’s story was torn to ribbons and used to tie together the scraps of the new story they had come up with, some of the Team was put to work on patching and updating D1 to salvage the wreck they delivered, while the rest re-worked the planned DLC into The Taken King. The former are the ones who saved D1, the latter are the ones who gave us D2 This is an older article, but there are a few things in it that may seem familiar. https://kotaku.com/the-messy-true-story-behind-the-making-of-destiny-1737556731 [quote]Destiny came out on September 9, 2014. Most of the development team was proud of the game, a source told me, and many were shocked to see harsh reviews; although most at Bungie had anticipated that players wouldn’t love the story, the team thought Destiny made up for that deficiency in many other ways. One source says they had internal surveys pegging the Metacritic score at around a 90 average; it turned out to be a 76. (Bungie then missed out on a major bonus, that source confirmed.) Critics and fans did indeed love the look and feel of the game, but even beyond the lackluster story, there was much to criticize in Destiny: the random loot system, the grindiness, the bizarre leveling, and many irritating bugs and glitches.[/quote] And what are some of the big changes from D1 to D2? No randomized loot. Significantly less grind. The story brings you to level 20 and nothing else requires leveling. [quote] Diablo III had launched to commercial success in 2012 but saw a great deal of criticism from fans thanks to randomized loot, frustrating online DRM, and a lack of endgame content. Both games shared a publisher, Activision, that thought Destiny could redeem itself in fans’ eyes the way Diablo III eventually had after its release. “They basically came in and said, ‘Look, here’s our story of developing Diablo III and then bringing in [the expansion] Reaper of Souls,’” said one person who was at the Blizzard talk. “They were saying, like, ‘Hey, random numbers are not fun—dice rolls are not fun. You can give the illusion of randomness, but you want to weight it towards the player… The only point you have to deliver on is that when people leave your game—because they will—when they leave your game, they need to be happy.’”[/quote] Less randomness, don’t worry about players leaving the game, just make sure they get everything they can out of it before they leave? Yep, sounds like D2’s design philosophy to me. And don’t take my word for it, ask the man himself. [quote] In previous interviews with Kotaku and other sites, director Luke Smith has talked openly about avoiding randomness and designing quests with guaranteed rewards, an approach that has served Destiny well throughout year two so far.[/quote] And that’s not all. [quote] Before anyone could be redeemed, Bungie had to ship The Taken King, which had been going through its own set of development issues. Pre-production on this expansion, which was code-named Comet, had started in late 2013. Two sources say the original plan was to release this major expansion at $60 and include a brand new planet, Europa, as well as a new area on Earth called the European Dead Zone (which itself had been pushed back from vanilla Destiny).[/quote] Well those names sure sound familiar, don’t they? So, yeah. Bungie has been constantly scrambling to release the minimum viable product at each new release window, and pushing back previously planned content to later releases, for the past 3 years. And to facilitate that, they have separate teams, working simultaneously on separate expansions with a staggered release schedule. So the people who brought us Taken King went immediately to work on Destiny 2, stitching it together out of the content they didn’t have enough time to put into Taken King, while also trying to fix the biggest criticisms vanilla D1 faced. Meanwhile, the live Team was working to make D1 better, patching it up with a series of system tweaks quality of life improvements. This happening at the same time. In retrospect, it should be no surprise at all that all the little ways D1 improved in the two years since Taken King got left out of D2.

No they are different people or they got lazy. Destiny 1 had amazing weapons and armor Destiny 2s best exotic weapons and armor are Destiny 1s average exotics. Destiny sold me on amazing weapons and awesome space powers. Now its.... i dont know what it is. -blam!- i spent 100 dollars on this shit and have two expansions to plan now. Atleast in D1 vanilla we had VoG.... fatebringer.... ghallahorn ugh....

People seem to forget, D1 was messed up and cut up from Day 1. The team who made this has been modified over time. Sure most of the principle Bungie employees were intact for both games, but there have been additions and deletions from that core group over the years. It would be highly speculative to say that misses the latest game are because of these personnel changes. BUT, it would not be surprising that with some of these personnel changes that some of the detracting things in this version of Destiny may easily be a result of these people. If you consider that the people who are no longer there were some of those involved with what made Halo(s) so good and so much fun, then with their absence and the addition of new people who are able to put their "spin" on what they think should be in the game, things like this can happen. Especially if the newer ones are "Yes" men, who somehow made their way into the fold. All they do is embolden poor decision making by not filtering critical decision making. Maybe Marty and Joe (I'm sure I'm missing some others) added some things that made the old games great, but their input is no more.

Destiny 1 had less in it when it launched.

Mechanics and aesthetics are pretty spot on... music, story, theme, mood, personality is surprisingly different. I feel like the task of breaking down both games would require writing a book about everything. I just started on PC (ahem) laptop, so I haven't quiet got a grasp of what this game is fully about. But as a fan of the first with minimal gripes overall, I'm enjoying this game in a slightly different way than the first. I can't wrap my head around it, I feel like this will take a while.

The "Destiny 1 was bad" excuse doesn't fly due to the fact that Destiny 2 is degraded from Destiny 1 Vanilla. For example: Why can you only access Crucible through a playlist? Want to play Control? Too bad, hope it comes up for you on the Playlist! Why can you only access Strikes through a playlist? Why can't you access any story missions except through the 3/week offering from Ikora? Why can't you access the Adventures except through the 4/day selection from the planetary vendors? These are really simple things that D1 did at launch that D2 does not.