{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/22/2017 10:06:57 AM
10
Is the 2017 Acura/Honda NSX an ABSOLUTE flop, a failed potential or just an OKAY car?
Before we discuss here is my opinion: I remember the words of the designer of this car saying that they "kept" the original design of the car, they still wanted it "beautiful" and "lightweight" when in fact its the absolute total opposite. LMAO
English
#Offtopic
-
5 RepliesWell, it's a Honda, so...
-
1 ReplyIts a fake ass super car. So many better cars for that money. 👎
-
-
Edited by BIGMAC103: 8/23/2017 11:24:40 PMIt doesn't even look close to the original. At all. And it's overpriced at 400,000. I'll buy the original for...shit, even the original ones are 100,000+ :/
-
I think it's a cool car. I think it has a place as a cool sports car. I do not think it is a worthy successor to the original NSX and why it is failing in drawing any acclaim. It looks like a modded Audi R8. If they didn't use the NSX name on it, it probably would have been just fine. But it's just another impractical 2 seater, not visually impressive enough to be a supercar (the nose is weird), not powerful enough to be a supercar, too stupidly over priced to be a sports car. For around the same money you could get an Audi R8 with more power.
-
2 RepliesChris Harris seemed to like it.
-
2 RepliesI've seen like 2 up here in Seattle. I think it's a nice car. Plus it has decent power and looks fun to drive.
-
4 RepliesBetter than Chrysler
-
1 ReplyIt's a very technically advanced car. It keeps with the idea of the original NSX of building a technically advanced car to take on Ferrari.
-
1 ReplyI love it actually. Had a friend that had a 2000 model. Was real fun to drive.
