{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/30/2017 8:53:00 PM
22
Or we could just use the old system. If it ain't broke don't "fix" it.
English
-
Edited by Atomic: 7/31/2017 5:26:19 PMYou mean the D1 system?
-
The change the the weapon slots where cost by pvp
-
I already know this.
-
It wasn't broken. The problem was that there wasn't enough variety with the old system. Problem solved.
-
LOL. Sure, I was just praying for months at having two weak primary weapons to choose from. I would rather have quality than variety.
-
Plenty of variety.
-
FACT.
-
lol you're -blam!-ing delusional if you think two primaries and a "power" weapon provides more variety.
-
It's a proven FACT.
-
Actually, it's an opinion. Don't be impaired.
-
Actually, it's a mathematical calculation. Don't be ignorant.
-
Prove it. While I don't doubt that the numbers purely support that, it doesn't equate to variety. Cramming at least 5 different weapon types into one slot ("power") is going to artificially inflate the numbers as is the fact that you can count using a hand cannon in both slots as an "option" when realistically it's not. It's a stupid system, and despite the raw numbers saying there's more variety that's not the case. As is the case in most people who try to use numbers/statistics, it's not just a matter of the numbers its a matter of actually interpreting their MEANING. Double primaries does not actually equate to more variety once you remove duplicates and take into account the artificial inflation of having all "power" weapons in one slot.
-
Lol @ you not really thinking that through.
-
Still waiting on your math to prove it. Btw
-
There is nothing extraordinary in regards to my math. It's already been proven using math in general.
-
Lol at stupid trolls with false "facts". Keep riding bungies dick and making excuses for them. It really goes far ;)
-
Ah, you're one of those mongoloids that think two primaries = more variety. Lol, sorry, I won't trouble your mind any further.
-
lol @ the backtracking after just realising it's mathematical FACT.
-
0.3/8.
-
0.3/8 represented as a percentage is 4% which would be the percentage of the player base that don't prefer 2 primaries.
-
[quote]Or we could just use the old system. If it ain't broke don't "fix" it.[/quote] I agree. But to do so would be a bitter pill for Bungie to swallow. That ain't happening...
-
Yup. :/
