{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/22/2017 5:35:58 PM
12
If the system can run It, then why Not? Why use an fps that the original Xbox could handle?
English
-
Because the system CAN'T HANDLE IT. The Bungie devs have stated that they've tried it, and I'd trust them, the ones actually creating the game that have done the tests, over the words of someone on the internet who has just played the game. It's not like they're trying to force us into 30 FPS, if they wanted to do that then PC framerate would be capped as well.
-
Titanfall 2 is running at 60 fps......And that's on the One
-
And Super Mario 64 was 60 fps, so there's that.
-
Man I feel old. Greatest game ever
-
While ME Andromeda is at 30fps and that just came out months ago.
-
Titanfall 2 isn't Destiny 2. There's no magic 60 fps button, the system can either run the game at 60 or it can't. The devs have stated that they've tried running 60 fps with Destiny 2 and it hasn't worked, and there's no reason not to believe them. Destiny 2 is a much more CPU intensive game than Titanfall 2.
-
Or its possible that instead of upgrading their shit, they decided to just use their current engine.
-
Creating a new engine would have taken resources that were used to create actual content. Not sure if you've looked at the development timeline for Destiny 1, but they spent almost five years developing the Tiger engine, if I remember correctly. Not only would creating a new engine use up resources that are better put to work on things like abilities, map creation, AI, and story content, it's also not even feasible given the fact that they had a deadline to meet. It would be great if Destiny could have a fresh start to create a better engine, knowing all they do now, but it's just not possible, at least not with Activision on their tail. And besides, I don't think I would appreciate having to wait years just to be able to play on an engine more optimized for frames per second. And I also have doubts that even if they're engine was more optimized that it would allow the game to handle 60 frames on something like PS4. We'll only be able to see how much the engine really has to do with it when PC D2 is released so people can see their fps compared to similar games.
-
Sum it up in 20 words or less
-
A new engine isn't worth the resources, and learn to read. Thirteen words.
-
I can read just fine. I just don't bother with walls of text
-
If you would take some time out of your day to read those "walls of text," you might find out something you didn't know before. To each their own, just trying to save you from looking like a dumbass.
